Mohammadreza Aladin et al v. Merrick B. Garland et al
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than May 16, 2022 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. (jgr)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.: 2:21-cv-09486-SB-MAR
May 9, 2022
Mohammadreza Aladin et al v. Merrick B. Garland et al.
Present: The Honorable
STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR., U.S. District Judge
Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s):
Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s):
[In Chambers] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: LACK OF
Generally, plaintiffs must serve process on defendants within 90 days of the
filing of the complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). This matter was filed on
December 7, 2021. Dkt. No. 1. More than 90 days have passed since the
complaint in this case was filed, and Plaintiff has not filed a proof of service for
any defendant. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than May 16,
2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.
The Court will consider as an appropriate response to this Order to Show
Cause the filing of proof(s) of service showing that the relevant defendant(s)
was/were served within the 90-day period or a showing of good cause for
extending the service period. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will
result in the dismissal without prejudice of the action in its entirety.
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Initials of Deputy Clerk JGR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?