Cory Mitchell v. Louis Milusnic et al

Filing 62

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATEJUDGE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 58 , IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 52 ) is granted, plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 55 ) is denied, and Judgment will be entered dismissing the Complaint and this action without prejudice. (es)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 CORY MITCHELL, ) Case No. 2:21-cv-9657-MWF-SP ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS v. ) AND RECOMMENDATION OF ) UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE LOUIS MILUSNIC, et al., ) JUDGE ) Defendants. ) _____________________________ ) 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, records on 18 file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. 19 Plaintiff has not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted, but 20 instead filed a letter requesting voluntary dismissal. The Court accepts the findings and 21 recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. 22 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment 23 (docket no. 52) is granted, plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 55) is 24 denied, and Judgment will be entered dismissing the Complaint and this action without 25 prejudice. 26 27 28 Dated: November 21, 2024 ____________________________________________ MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?