Cory Mitchell v. Louis Milusnic et al
Filing
62
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATEJUDGE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 58 , IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 52 ) is granted, plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 55 ) is denied, and Judgment will be entered dismissing the Complaint and this action without prejudice. (es)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
CORY MITCHELL,
) Case No. 2:21-cv-9657-MWF-SP
)
Plaintiff,
)
) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS
v.
) AND RECOMMENDATION OF
) UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
LOUIS MILUSNIC, et al.,
) JUDGE
)
Defendants. )
_____________________________ )
16
17
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, records on
18
file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.
19
Plaintiff has not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted, but
20
instead filed a letter requesting voluntary dismissal. The Court accepts the findings and
21
recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
22
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment
23
(docket no. 52) is granted, plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 55) is
24
denied, and Judgment will be entered dismissing the Complaint and this action without
25
prejudice.
26
27
28
Dated: November 21, 2024
____________________________________________
MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?