Fatemeh Mahalati v. Matthew Gary Shultz et al
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing, by no later than May 13, 2022 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. (jgr)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.: 2:22-cv-00803-SB-AS
May 7, 2022
Fatemeh Mahalati v. Matthew Gary Shultz, et al.
Present: The Honorable
STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR., U.S. District Judge
Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s):
Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s):
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: LACK OF
Generally, plaintiffs must serve process on defendants within 90 days of the
filing of the complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). This matter was filed on
February 4, 2022. Dkt. No. 1. More than 90 days have passed since the complaint
in this case was filed, and Plaintiff has not filed a proof of service for any
defendant. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than May 13,
2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.
The Court will consider as an appropriate response to this Order to Show
Cause the filing of proofs of service showing that the relevant defendants were
served within the 90-day period or a showing of good cause for extending the
service period. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the
dismissal without prejudice of the action in its entirety.
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Initials of Deputy Clerk JGR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?