Fatemeh Mahalati v. Matthew Gary Shultz et al

Filing 14

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing, by no later than May 13, 2022 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. (jgr)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No.: 2:22-cv-00803-SB-AS Title: Date: May 7, 2022 Fatemeh Mahalati v. Matthew Gary Shultz, et al. Present: The Honorable STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR., U.S. District Judge Jennifer Graciano Deputy Clerk N/A Court Reporter Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): N/A N/A Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: LACK OF PROSECUTION Generally, plaintiffs must serve process on defendants within 90 days of the filing of the complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). This matter was filed on February 4, 2022. Dkt. No. 1. More than 90 days have passed since the complaint in this case was filed, and Plaintiff has not filed a proof of service for any defendant. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than May 13, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause the filing of proofs of service showing that the relevant defendants were served within the 90-day period or a showing of good cause for extending the service period. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the dismissal without prejudice of the action in its entirety. CV-90 (12/02) CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL 1 Initials of Deputy Clerk JGR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?