Microsoft Corporation v. MediaPointe, Inc. et al

Filing 230

JUDGMENT by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: 227 Pursuant to the Courts January 4, 2024 Order Granting Microsofts Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement [ECF No. 202], July 7, 2023 Order Regarding Claim Construction [ECF No. 106], and the parties Stip ulation Regarding Proposed Final Judgment, the Court orders, adjudges, and decrees: 1. Final judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation with respect to its First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 39) for Declaratory Judgment that: ( a) Microsoft does not infringe claims 1, 34, and 68 of the 195 Patent (Second Claim for Relief); (b) Claims 2 and 13 of the 195 Patent are Invalid (Fourth Claim for Relief); and (c) Claims 1, 2, 6, 11, and 1517 of the 426 Patent are Invalid (Third Cl aim for Relief). 2. Final judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation with respect to Defendants MediaPointe and AMHC, Inc.s First Amended Counterclaim (Dkt. 58) for Direct Infringement of the 195 Patent (Second Claim for R elief). 3. Microsoft Corporations First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 39) for Declaratory Judgment That Microsoft Does Not Infringe The 426 Patent (First Claim for Relief), Microsoft Corporations First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 39) for Declaratory Judgment That The 195 Patent is Invalid (Fourth Claim for Relief) as to all claims of the 195 Patent except claims 2 and 13, and Defendants First Amended Counterclaim (Dkt. 58) for Infringement of the 426 Patent (First Counterclaim for Relief) are dismissed without prejudice. 4. Defendants shall take nothing from its claims against Microsoft Corporation. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)

1
2
3
NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT
JS-6

4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

WESTERN DIVISION
Case No. 2:22-cv-01009-MCS-MRW

11 MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,

12
13

FINAL JUDGMENT

v.

14 MEDIAPOINTE, INC. AND AMHC,
INC.,
15
Defendants.
16
17 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
Case No.2:22-cv-01009-MCS-MRW

1

Pursuant to the Court’s January 4, 2024 Order Granting Microsoft’s Motion for

2

Summary Judgment of Noninfringement [ECF No. 202], July 7, 2023 Order

3

Regarding Claim Construction [ECF No. 106], and the parties’ Stipulation Regarding

4

Proposed Final Judgment, the Court orders, adjudges, and decrees:

5

1.

Final judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Microsoft

6

Corporation with respect to its First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 39) for Declaratory

7

Judgment that:

8

(a) Microsoft does not infringe claims 1, 3–4, and 6–8 of the ’195 Patent

9

(Second Claim for Relief);

10

(b) Claims 2 and 13 of the ’195 Patent are Invalid (Fourth Claim for Relief);

11

and

12

(c) Claims 1, 2, 6, 11, and 15–17 of the ’426 Patent are Invalid (Third Claim

13

for Relief).

14

2.

Final judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Microsoft

15

Corporation with respect to Defendants MediaPointe and AMHC, Inc.’s First

16

Amended Counterclaim (Dkt. 58) for Direct Infringement of the ’195 Patent (Second

17

Claim for Relief).

18

3.

Microsoft Corporation’s First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 39) for

19

Declaratory Judgment That Microsoft Does Not Infringe The ’426 Patent (First Claim

20

for Relief), Microsoft Corporation’s First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 39) for

21

Declaratory Judgment That The ’195 Patent is Invalid (Fourth Claim for Relief) as to

22

all claims of the ’195 Patent except claims 2 and 13, and Defendants’ First Amended

23

Counterclaim (Dkt. 58) for Infringement of the ’426 Patent (First Counterclaim for

24

Relief) are dismissed without prejudice.

25
26

4.

Defendants shall take nothing from its claims against Microsoft

Corporation.

27
28
1

[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
Case No.2:22-cv-01009-MCS-MRW

5.

1

The Court will address any motion by Microsoft for costs and/or

2

attorneys’ fees in a separate order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d). Microsoft is granted a two

3

week extension of time to file its bill of costs and motion for attorneys’ fees.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

Dated: February 9, 2024

______________________________
MARK C. SCARSI
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

__

[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
Case No.2:22-cv-01009-MCS-MRW