Matthew Rodriguez v. City of Baldwin Park et al

Filing 134

FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS MANNY LOZANO AND JEAN AYALA AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF MATTHEW RODRIGUEZ by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: Having granted summary judgment in favor of Defendants Manny Lozano and Jean Ayala, the court hereby ORDERS judgment be entered in favor of Defendants Manny Lozano and Jean Ayala as to each and all of the remaining causes of action asserted by Plaintiff Matthew Rodriguez against Defendant Manny Lozano, i.e., the Sixth Cause of Action for Fraudulent Misrepr esentation. Plaintiff did not oppose the Summary Judgment Motion of Defendant Jean Ayala and agreed to dismiss the First, Second, and Third Causes of Action against Defendant Manny Lozano. The court therefore grants judgment in favor of Defendants Ma nny Lozano and Jean Ayala. and ORDERS that Plaintiff Matthew Rodriguez take nothing on his First Amended Complaint against Defendants Manny Lozano and Jean Ayala. The court FURTHER ORDERS that Defendant Manny Lozano is a prevailing party entitled to his costs under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54, to be taxed in a sum to be determined. (lc) Modified on 9/25/2024 (lc).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12 MATTHEW RODRIGUEZ,

Case No. 2:22-cv-01069-FLA-MAR

13

FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF
DEFENDANTS MANNY LOZANO
AND JEAN AYALA AND AGAINST
PLAINTIFF MATTHEW
RODRIGUEZ

14

Plaintiff,
v.

15 CITY OF BALDWIN PARK, a
Municipal Corporation; STEVE
16 MCLEAN, an individual; MANNY
LOZANO, an individual; JEAN AYALA,
17 an individual; and DOES 1-50, inclusive,
18

Defendants.

19
20

On March 8, 2024, Defendants Manny Lozano and Jean Ayala filed a Motion for

21 Summary Judgment against Plaintiff Matthew Rodriguez. Dkt. 87. Having granted
22 summary judgment in favor of Defendants Manny Lozano and Jean Ayala, the court
23 hereby ORDERS judgment be entered in favor of Defendants Manny Lozano and Jean
24 Ayala as to each and all of the remaining causes of action asserted by Plaintiff Matthew
25 Rodriguez against Defendant Manny Lozano, i.e., the Sixth Cause of Action for
26 Fraudulent Misrepresentation. Plaintiff did not oppose the Summary Judgment Motion
27 of Defendant Jean Ayala and agreed to dismiss the First, Second, and Third Causes of
28 Action against Defendant Manny Lozano. The court therefore grants judgment in favor

1 of Defendants Manny Lozano and Jean Ayala. and ORDERS that Plaintiff Matthew
2 Rodriguez take nothing on his First Amended Complaint against Defendants Manny
3 Lozano and Jean Ayala. The court FURTHER ORDERS that Defendant Manny Lozano
4 is a prevailing party entitled to his costs under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54, to
5 be taxed in a sum to be determined.
6
7

Dated: September 25, 2024
FERNANDO L. AENLLE-ROCHA
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-