Walter H. Smith v. FCA US LLC et al
Filing
81
JUDGMENT by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: For the reasons stated in the court's August 12, 2024 Order 80 , the court ENTERS judgment in favor of Defendant PAC Auto Group., Inc and against Plaintiff Walter H. Smith as follows: 1. The final a rbitration award issued on October 19, 2023, by Arbitrator Donald B. Cripe in the American Arbitration Association case styled as Walter H. Smith v. PAC Auto Group, Inc., Case No. 01-22-0003-4509 ("Final Arbitration Award") (Dkt. 64-3, Ex. 3), is CONFIRMED in its entirety.2. The court AWARDS Defendant $2,431.35 in costs, as set forth in the FinalArbitration Award. (lc)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
17
18
19
20
21
22
JUDGMENT
Plaintiff,
v.
FCA US LLC and PAC AUTO GROUP,
INC.,
15
16
Case No.: 2:22-cv-03734-FLA(AGRx)
WALTER H. SMITH,
Defendants.
________________________________________
PAC AUTO GROUP, INC.,
Cross-Complainant,
v.
FCA US LLC,
Cross-Defendant.
23
24
25
26
27
28
____________________________________________________________________________________
1
1
For the reasons stated in the court’s August 12, 2024 Order (Dkt. 80), the court
2
ENTERS judgment in favor of Defendant PAC Auto Group., Inc (“Defendant”) and
3
against Plaintiff Walter H. Smith (“Plaintiff”) as follows:
4
1.
The final arbitration award issued on October 19, 2023, by Arbitrator
5
Donald B. Cripe in the American Arbitration Association case styled as Walter H. Smith
6
v. PAC Auto Group, Inc., Case No. 01-22-0003-4509 (“Final Arbitration Award”) (Dkt.
7
64-3, Ex. 3), is CONFIRMED in its entirety.
8
9
2.
The court AWARDS Defendant $2,431.35 in costs, as set forth in the Final
Arbitration Award.
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
14
15
Dated: August 28, 2024
_______________________________
FERNANDO L. AENLLE-ROCHA
United States District Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
____________________________________________________________________________________
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?