John Kantarji v. James River Insurance Company et al
Filing
27
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 26 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. The Court, having considered the parties Joint Stipulation for Dismissal Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby dismisses with prejudice the above-entitled action. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys fees. The Court VACATES all dates and deadlines. The Clerk of the Court shall close the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (rolm)
Case 2:22-cv-04579-ODW-AFM Document 27 Filed 11/16/22 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:370
1
JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
United States District Court
Central District of California
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOHN KANTARJI,
Plaintiff,
v.
JAMES RIVER INSURANCE
COMPANY ET AL.,
Defendants.
Case № 2:22-cv-04579-ODW (AFMx)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE
Case 2:22-cv-04579-ODW-AFM Document 27 Filed 11/16/22 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:371
1
The Court, having considered the parties’ Joint Stipulation for Dismissal
2
Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby
3
dismisses with prejudice the above-entitled action. Each party shall bear its own costs
4
and attorneys’ fees. The Court VACATES all dates and deadlines. The Clerk of the
5
Court shall close the case.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
November 16, 2022
10
11
12
13
____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?