John Kantarji v. James River Insurance Company et al

Filing 27

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 26 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. The Court, having considered the parties Joint Stipulation for Dismissal Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby dismisses with prejudice the above-entitled action. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys fees. The Court VACATES all dates and deadlines. The Clerk of the Court shall close the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (rolm)

Download PDF
Case 2:22-cv-04579-ODW-AFM Document 27 Filed 11/16/22 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:370 1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court Central District of California 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOHN KANTARJI, Plaintiff, v. JAMES RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL., Defendants. Case № 2:22-cv-04579-ODW (AFMx) ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case 2:22-cv-04579-ODW-AFM Document 27 Filed 11/16/22 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:371 1 The Court, having considered the parties’ Joint Stipulation for Dismissal 2 Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby 3 dismisses with prejudice the above-entitled action. Each party shall bear its own costs 4 and attorneys’ fees. The Court VACATES all dates and deadlines. The Clerk of the 5 Court shall close the case. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 November 16, 2022 10 11 12 13 ____________________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?