Ping Yang v. Susan Curda
Filing
14
ORDER DISMISSING CASE 13 by Judge Percy Anderson. Having read and considered the Joint Stipulation to Dismiss the Case submitted by the parties, and finding good cause therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The instant action shall be dismissed without prejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (rolm)
1
2
3
JS-6
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
WESTERN DIVISION
13
14
15
PING YANG,
No. CV 22-4856-PA-PVC
Plaintiff,
v.
16
17 SUSAN CURDA,
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Defendant.
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
Honorable Percy Anderson
United States District Judge
1
2
Having read and considered the Joint Stipulation to Dismiss the Case submitted by
the parties, and finding good cause therefor,
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. The instant action shall be dismissed without prejudice;
5
2. USCIS agrees to interview Plaintiff on December 29, 2022 at 8:45 a.m.;
6
3. Defendants agree to diligently work towards adjudication of Plaintiffs’ I-589
7
Application for Asylum and Withholding of Removal within 120 days of the
8
completion of Plaintiff’s interview, absent unforeseen or exceptional
9
circumstances that would require additional time to complete adjudication;
10
11
12
4. In the event that adjudication is not completed within 120 days of the
completion of the interview, Plaintiff may refile this action;
5. Plaintiff agrees to submit all supplemental documents and evidence, if any, to
13
USCIS seven (7) to ten (10) days prior to the agreed upon scheduled interview.
14
Plaintiff recognizes that failure to submit these documents seven (7) to ten (10)
15
days prior to the interview may result in the interview being rescheduled at no
16
fault of USCIS; and
17
18
6. Each party shall bear his, her or its own litigation costs and attorney fees.
Dated: September 16, 2022
19
20
21
____________________________________
PERCY ANDERSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?