Ford Motor Company v. Crov Inc. et al

Filing 54

ORDER RE PERMANENT INJUNCTION by Judge Dale S. Fischer, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that Sunward, including its officers, agents, representatives, employees, parent entities, subsidiaries, and all persons and/or entities in active concert or participation with any of them, who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise, shall be forever and permanently restrained and enjoined. See Order for specifics. (jp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 9 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a 10 Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 2:22-CV-05552-DSF-AGR ORDER RE PERMANENT INJUNCTION v. CROV INC. d/b/a crov.com, a Delaware Corporation; SUNWARD LOGISTICS USA LLC, a California Limited Liability Company; QINGDAO HAIRUNKAIYUAN AUTO PARTS CO., LTD., d/b/a www.freedream4x4.com and also Qingdao Yuanxi Auto Parts Co., LTD., a Chinese business entity; FD-ALL TOGETHER AUTOMOTIVE INC., a California Corporation; YUNQI “JACKY” HAN, an individual; YUNFANG “CHERYL” HAN, an individual; and, DOES 3 through 30 inclusive, Defendants. Honorable Dale S. Fischer 1 Plaintiff Ford Motor Company (“Ford”), by and through its counsel, and 2 Defendant Sunward Logistics USA LLC (“Sunward”), by and through its counsel, 3 (together, the “Parties”), having STIPULATED and AGREED to the Court’s entry 4 of the following permanent injunction, the Court ORDERS as follows: 5 STIPULATED FINDINGS 6 WHEREAS, Ford has a pending civil action in the United States District 7 Court for the Central District of California against certain defendants, including 8 Sunward, which alleges claims under the Lanham Act for trademark infringement 9 and counterfeiting, as well as unfair competition, principally related to the alleged 10 importation, distribution, and resale of allegedly counterfeit Ford-branded products, 11 Case No. 2:22-CV-05552-DSF-AGR (the “Civil Action”); 12 WHEREAS, Sunward has denied the allegations against it in the Civil Action; 13 WHEREAS, the Parties have informed the Court that they have entered a 14 Confidential Settlement Agreement to resolve the Civil Action as between them, 15 which includes the entry of this Order re stipulated permanent injunction (the 16 “Order”), as well as the voluntary dismissal of the Civil Action with prejudice as to 17 Sunward; 18 WHEREAS, Sunward has stipulated to the Court’s jurisdiction over it, and 19 has stipulated to the facts necessary to establish jurisdiction over the Civil Action, 20 for purposes of entering and/or enforcing this Order and/or any other terms of the 21 Confidential Settlement Agreement; and, 22 WHEREAS, Ford has stipulated to the voluntary dismissal of Sunward with 23 prejudice upon entry of this Order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(a), and has 24 informed the Court that it intends to file the same following entry of this Order. 25 ORDER RE PERMANENT INJUNCTION 26 Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that Sunward, including its 27 officers, agents, representatives, employees, parent entities, subsidiaries, and all 28 persons and/or entities in active concert or participation with any of them, who 2 1 receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise, shall be forever 2 and permanently restrained and enjoined from shipping, importing, storing, 3 advertising, promoting, marketing, offering to sell, selling, or otherwise distributing 4 or facilitating the distribution of any counterfeit Ford-branded product(s), and/or 5 otherwise infringing any of Ford’s trademarks. 6 The Court shall retain jurisdiction to make such orders as may be needed, if 7 any, to enforce this injunction or the terms of the settlement between the Parties. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 DATED: December 1, 2023 13 14 _____________________________________ Dale D l S. S Fischer Fi h United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?