Tryvon Glover v. City of Pasadena et al
Filing
46
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled 45 , IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown by no later than 45 days, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action without prejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
1
2
3
JS-6
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
TRYVON GLOVER,
Plaintiff,
11
12
v.
13
CITY OF PASADENA, et al.
14
Defendants.
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV 22-5752 FMO (MARx)
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
16
Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, (Dkt. 45,
17
Joint Notice of Conditional Settlement), IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is
18
hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown by no
19
later than 45 days, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full
20
jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to
21
re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall
22
be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action without prejudice. See Fed. R.
23
Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962).
24
Dated this 10th day of August, 2023.
25
26
27
28
/s/
Fernando M. Olguin
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?