James Anthony Gonzales v. The People Of The State Of California
Filing
17
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. for Amended Report and Recommendation 15 . IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner's request for a stay of this action is DENIED for the failure to satisfy the criteria set forth in Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005); and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice because it is wholly unexhausted. (hr)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
JAMES ANTHONY GONZALES,
Petitioner,
12
v.
13
14
15
16
17
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA,
Respondent.
_________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NO. 2:22-cv-05828-SB-KS
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
18
19
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas
20
Corpus (“Petition”), all of the records herein, the Amended Report and Recommendation of
21
United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), and Petitioner’s Objections to the Magistrate
22
Judge’s Original Report and Recommendation (“Objections”).
23
636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those
24
portions of the Report to which objections have been stated. Having completed its review, the
25
Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report.
26
\\
27
\\
28
\\
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner’s request for a stay of this action is
2
DENIED for the failure to satisfy the criteria set forth in Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269
3
(2005); and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice because it
4
is wholly unexhausted.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DATED: November 21, 2022
________________________________
STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?