James Anthony Gonzales v. The People Of The State Of California

Filing 17

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. for Amended Report and Recommendation 15 . IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner's request for a stay of this action is DENIED for the failure to satisfy the criteria set forth in Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005); and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice because it is wholly unexhausted. (hr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 JAMES ANTHONY GONZALES, Petitioner, 12 v. 13 14 15 16 17 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. _________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 2:22-cv-05828-SB-KS ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas 20 Corpus (“Petition”), all of the records herein, the Amended Report and Recommendation of 21 United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), and Petitioner’s Objections to the Magistrate 22 Judge’s Original Report and Recommendation (“Objections”). 23 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those 24 portions of the Report to which objections have been stated. Having completed its review, the 25 Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. 26 \\ 27 \\ 28 \\ Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner’s request for a stay of this action is 2 DENIED for the failure to satisfy the criteria set forth in Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 3 (2005); and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice because it 4 is wholly unexhausted. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: November 21, 2022 ________________________________ STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?