GS Holistic, LLC v. Crown Smoke and Vape, Inc. et al
Filing
15
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal For Lack Of Prosecution by Judge Percy Anderson: In the present case, it appears that this time period has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before November 23, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. [See document for additional information.] (es)
Case 2:22-cv-06110-PA-MAR Document 15 Filed 11/16/22 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:62
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
CV 22-6110 PA
Title
GS Holistic, LLC v. Crown Smoke and Vape, Inc. et al
Present: The
Honorable
Date
November 16, 2022
PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Patricia Kim
Not Reported
N/A
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter
Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
None
None
Proceedings:
Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal For Lack Of Prosecution
Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if
the defendant is the United States). Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1).
In the present case, it appears that this time period has not been met. Accordingly, the
court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before November 23,
2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for
submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the
filing of plaintiff’s response. Failure to respond to this Order may result in the imposition of
sanctions, including but not limited to dismissal of the complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
:
Initials of Preparer
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
pk
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?