Nevada Breeze v. County of Los Angeles et al

Filing 116

PARTIAL JUDGMENT 115 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: Pursuant to the Court's Order Re: Motion to Dismiss, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that Plaintiff Nevada Breeze's claim against Defendant City of Pasadena is dismissed with prejudice. Ju dgment is entered in favor of Defendant City of Pasadena and against Plaintiff. Plaintiff shall take nothing from her action against them. Pursuant to the Court's Order Dismissing Action Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), it is o rdered, adjudged, and decreed that all of Plaintiff Breeze's claims against Defendants Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., and Kaiser Foundation Hospitals are dismissed without prejudice. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., and Kaiser Foundation Hospitals and against Plaintiff. Plaintiff shall take nothing from her action against them. (lc)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

NEVADA BREEZE,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Case No. 2:22-cv-06342-MCS-JPR
PARTIAL JUDGMENT

v.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; CITY
OF PASADENA, KARLA BENNETT,
individually and in her official
capacity; SAMANTHA GREEN,
individually and in her official
capacity; KAISER FOUNDATION
HEALTH PLAN, INC., a.k.a. KAISER
PERMANENTE; KAISER
FOUNDATION HOSPITALS a.k.a.
KAISER PERMANENTE; and DOES
1-10,
Defendants.

23
24
25
26
27
28
1

1

Pursuant to the Court’s Order Re: Motion to Dismiss, it is ordered, adjudged and

2

decreed that Plaintiff Nevada Breeze’s claim against Defendant City of Pasadena is

3

dismissed with prejudice. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant City of Pasadena

4

and against Plaintiff. Plaintiff shall take nothing from her action against them.

5

Pursuant to the Court’s Order Dismissing Action Pursuant to Federal Rule of

6

Civil Procedure 41(b), it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that all of Plaintiff Breeze’s

7

claims against Defendants Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., and Kaiser Foundation

8

Hospitals are dismissed without prejudice. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants

9

Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., and Kaiser Foundation Hospitals and against

10

Plaintiff. Plaintiff shall take nothing from her action against them.

11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.

13
14

Dated: February 5, 2024
MARK C. SCARSI
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2