Nevada Breeze v. County of Los Angeles et al

Filing 116

PARTIAL JUDGMENT 115 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: Pursuant to the Court's Order Re: Motion to Dismiss, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that Plaintiff Nevada Breeze's claim against Defendant City of Pasadena is dismissed with prejudice. Ju dgment is entered in favor of Defendant City of Pasadena and against Plaintiff. Plaintiff shall take nothing from her action against them. Pursuant to the Court's Order Dismissing Action Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), it is o rdered, adjudged, and decreed that all of Plaintiff Breeze's claims against Defendants Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., and Kaiser Foundation Hospitals are dismissed without prejudice. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., and Kaiser Foundation Hospitals and against Plaintiff. Plaintiff shall take nothing from her action against them. (lc)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NEVADA BREEZE, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Case No. 2:22-cv-06342-MCS-JPR PARTIAL JUDGMENT v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; CITY OF PASADENA, KARLA BENNETT, individually and in her official capacity; SAMANTHA GREEN, individually and in her official capacity; KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, INC., a.k.a. KAISER PERMANENTE; KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS a.k.a. KAISER PERMANENTE; and DOES 1-10, Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 1 Pursuant to the Court’s Order Re: Motion to Dismiss, it is ordered, adjudged and 2 decreed that Plaintiff Nevada Breeze’s claim against Defendant City of Pasadena is 3 dismissed with prejudice. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant City of Pasadena 4 and against Plaintiff. Plaintiff shall take nothing from her action against them. 5 Pursuant to the Court’s Order Dismissing Action Pursuant to Federal Rule of 6 Civil Procedure 41(b), it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that all of Plaintiff Breeze’s 7 claims against Defendants Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., and Kaiser Foundation 8 Hospitals are dismissed without prejudice. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants 9 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., and Kaiser Foundation Hospitals and against 10 Plaintiff. Plaintiff shall take nothing from her action against them. 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 Dated: February 5, 2024 MARK C. SCARSI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?