William Baker v. Twitter, Inc. et al

Filing 163

JUDGMENT by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: Pursuant to this Courts Order Granting Defendants Motions to Dismiss 162 , IT IS ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed with prejudice. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Twitter, Inc., Jack Dorsey, Ned Segal, Parag Agrawal, and Damien Kieran, and against Lead Plaintiff William Baker and additional Plaintiffs Jill Sligay, Lenard Roque, and Amolkumar Vaidya. Plaintiffs shall take nothing from this action. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

JS-6

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13
14
15

WILLIAM BAKER, JILL SLIGAY,
LENARD ROQUE, and
AMOLKUMAR VAIDYA,
Individually and on Behalf of All
Others Similarly Situated,

18

v.

20

TWITTER, INC., JACK DORSEY,
NED SEGAL, PARAG AGRAWAL,
and DAMIEN KIERAN,

21

Defendants.

19

JUDGMENT

Plaintiffs,

16
17

Case No. 2:22-cv-06525-MCS-E

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

1

Pursuant to this Court’s Order Granting Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss,

2

IT IS ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed with prejudice. Judgment is

3

entered in favor of Defendants Twitter, Inc., Jack Dorsey, Ned Segal, Parag Agrawal,

4

and Damien Kieran, and against Lead Plaintiff William Baker and additional Plaintiffs

5

Jill Sligay, Lenard Roque, and Amolkumar Vaidya. Plaintiffs shall take nothing from

6

this action.

7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10

Dated: March 5, 2024
MARK C. SCARSI
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2