Yanyan Yu v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
Filing
11
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett.The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before February 2, 2023, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (iv)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No.
CV 22-07214-SPG(MARx)
Title
Yanyan Yu v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
Present: The Honorable
Date
January 19, 2023
SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
P. Gomez
Deputy Clerk
Not Reported
Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Not Present
Not Present
Proceeding:
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK
OF PROSECUTION
Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for
lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent
power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).
The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own
motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before February 2, 2023,
why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand
submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to
respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.
Defendant(s):
Alejandro Mayorkas;
Ur Mendoza Jaddou; and
Rosemary Langley Melville
did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of
default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No.
CV 22-07214-SPG(MARx)
Title
Yanyan Yu v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
Date
January 19, 2023
seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
:
Initials of Preparer
pg
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?