AirDoctor, LLC v. Homeburg Limited et al
Filing
44
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. Plaintiff AirDoctor LLC is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE for the failure to comply with the joint filing process and to submit a substantive response to the discovery motion by November 17, at 12:00 p.m. (see document for further details) (hr)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
CV 23-00352-GW (ASx)
Title
AirDoctor, LLC v. Homeburg Limited, et al.,
Present:
Date
November 15, 2023
Hon. Alka Sagar, U.S. Magistrate Judge
Alma Felix
n/a
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys for Plaintiff:
Attorneys for Defendant:
n/a
n/a
Proceedings:
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Defendant Homeburg Inc., filed a motion to compel Plaintiff to produce certain
documents. (“Motion) (Dkt. Nop. 43). This discovery motion is not in the joint format
mandated under the Local Rules. The motion is accompanied by a statement that indicates that
Plaintiff did not provide its portion of the joint motion before the moving party filed it and failed
to confer in accordance with this Court’s Local Rule 37-1. (Dkt. No. 43-1 at 4; Exhibit F).
1.
2.
A party’s failure to file a required document within a deadline set by local rule or
to cooperate in the submission of a joint discovery motion “may be deemed consent to the
granting [ ] of the motion.” Local Rule 7-12. Therefore, Plaintiff AirDoctor LLC is ORDERED
TO SHOW CAUSE for the failure to comply with the joint filing process and to submit a
substantive response to the discovery motion by November 17, at 12:00 p.m. If the Court does
not receive any submission, the motion will be granted as unopposed under local rule without
further proceedings. The Court will also award expenses to the moving party as required under
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5).
CV-90 (10/08)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?