Rhonda Baylor v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 96

FINAL JUDGMENT 95 by Judge Wesley L. Hsu. Pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court's prior Order Re Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint 86 (ECF No. 94 ), and all claims in the operative complaint (ECF No. 83 ) having been dismissed without leave to amend, IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, and that FINAL JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs. (lom)

Download PDF
1 -6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 WESTERN DIVISION 10 11 12 13 RHONDA BAYLOR, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, 14 15 16 17 18 19 Case No. 2:23-cv-00794-WLH-AGR CLASS ACTION FINAL JUDGMENT v. HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD. and AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR COMPANY, INC., Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FINAL JUDGMENT 2:23-cv-00794-WLH-AGR 1 Pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court’s 2 prior Order Re Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint [86] 3 (ECF No. 94), and all claims in the operative complaint (ECF No. 83) having been 4 dismissed without leave to amend, 5 IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, 6 and that FINAL JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendants and against 7 Plaintiffs. 8 9 10 11 Dated: May 28, 2024 ____________________________ HON. WESLEY L. HSU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 FINAL JUDGMENT 2:23-cv-00794-WLH-AGR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?