Rhonda Baylor v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd. et al
Filing
96
FINAL JUDGMENT 95 by Judge Wesley L. Hsu. Pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court's prior Order Re Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint 86 (ECF No. 94 ), and all claims in the operative complaint (ECF No. 83 ) having been dismissed without leave to amend, IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, and that FINAL JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs. (lom)
1
-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
WESTERN DIVISION
10
11
12
13
RHONDA BAYLOR, Individually and
On Behalf of All Others Similarly
Situated,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
18
19
Case No. 2:23-cv-00794-WLH-AGR
CLASS ACTION
FINAL JUDGMENT
v.
HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD. and
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR
COMPANY, INC.,
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FINAL JUDGMENT
2:23-cv-00794-WLH-AGR
1
Pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court’s
2
prior Order Re Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint [86]
3
(ECF No. 94), and all claims in the operative complaint (ECF No. 83) having been
4
dismissed without leave to amend,
5
IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice,
6
and that FINAL JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendants and against
7
Plaintiffs.
8
9
10
11
Dated: May 28, 2024
____________________________
HON. WESLEY L. HSU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
FINAL JUDGMENT
2:23-cv-00794-WLH-AGR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?