Robert Perkins v. Robert Carlson et al

Filing 33

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero re Stipulation for Protective Order 32 . (see document for details). (et)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROBERT PERKINS, an individual, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 v. [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ROBERT CARLSON, an individual; WILLIAM PROTECTIVE ORDER BETTENCOURT, an individual; DAVID TANNER, an individual; and ARBOR SNOWBOARDS, INC., a California corporation, Defendants. ROBERT CARLSON, an individual; WILLIAM BETTENCOURT, an individual; DAVID TANNER, an individual; and ARBOR SNOWBOARDS, INC., a California corporation, Counter-Claimants, 20 21 22 23 vs. ROBERT PERKINS, an individual; ALAN KIRK, an individual; and NORTHSTAR DESIGN GROUP, LLC, a Washington limited liability company. 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 2:23-cv-02283-FLA-MAA Counter-Defendants. 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any Case No. 2:23-CV-02283-FLA-MAA 1 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – Case No. 2:23-CV-02283 164294940.1 1 purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby 2 stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties 3 acknowledge that this Stipulated Protective Order does not confer blanket protections on all 4 disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and 5 use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 6 under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 13.3, 7 below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information 8 under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards 9 that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 10 11 2. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT This action is likely to involve trade secrets, customer and pricing lists and other valuable 12 research, development, commercial, financial, and/or proprietary information for which special 13 protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this 14 action is warranted. Such confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among 15 other things, confidential business or financial information, information regarding 16 confidential business practices, or other confidential research, development, or commercial 17 information (including information implicating privacy rights of third parties), information 18 otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or otherwise protected 19 from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. 20 Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes 21 over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties are 22 entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses 23 of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end 24 of the litigation, and to serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified 25 in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as confidential 26 for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been 27 maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part 28 2 Case No. 2:23-CV-02283-FLA-MAA [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – Case No. 2:23-CV-02283 164294940.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 of the public record of this case. 3. DEFINITIONS 3.1 Action: Robert Perkins v. Robert Carlson, et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-02283-FLA-MAA pending in the Central District of California, and the related Counter-Claims; 3.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Stipulated Protective Order. 3.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 8 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule 9 of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. 10 11 12 3.4 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and In-House Counsel (as well as their support staff). 3.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it 13 produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY 14 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”. 15 3.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the 16 medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, 17 testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that is produced or generated in disclosures or 18 responses to discovery in this matter. 19 3.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 20 the litigation who (1) has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as 21 a consultant in this action, (2) is not a past or current employee of a Party or of a Party’s 22 competitor, and (3) at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee of a Party or 23 of a Party’s competitor. 24 3.8 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or 25 Items: extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items,” disclosure of which to another 26 Party or Non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by 27 less restrictive means. 28 3 Case No. 2:23-CV-02283-FLA-MAA [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – Case No. 2:23-CV-02283 164294940.1 1 2 3.9 Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 3 4 In-House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. In-House 3.10 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 5 3.11 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this 6 action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action 7 on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party, 8 and includes support staff). 9 3.12 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 10 consultants, retained experts, In-House Counsel and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support 11 staffs). 12 13 3.13 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this action. 14 3.14 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 15 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and 16 organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and 17 subcontractors. 18 19 3.15 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL,” or as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 20 3.16 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 21 Producing Party. 22 4. 23 SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulated Protective Order cover not only Protected 24 Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected 25 Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any 26 testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected 27 Material. However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the 28 4 Case No. 2:23-CV-02283-FLA-MAA [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – Case No. 2:23-CV-02283 164294940.1 1 following information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to 2 a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as 3 a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the 4 public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party 5 prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who 6 obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating 7 Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or the 8 orders of the trial judge. This Stipulated Protective Order does not govern the use of Protected 9 Material at trial. 10 4. 11 DURATION Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this 12 Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order 13 otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims 14 and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the 15 completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, 16 including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to 17 applicable law. 18 6. 19 DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 6.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party 20 or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Stipulated Protective 21 Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the 22 appropriate standards. To the extent it is practical to do so, the Designating Party must designate 23 for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications 24 that qualify – so that other portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for 25 which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 26 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are 27 shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to 28 5 Case No. 2:23-CV-02283-FLA-MAA [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – Case No. 2:23-CV-02283 164294940.1 1 unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary 2 expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Designating Party to sanctions. 3 If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated 4 for protection do not qualify for protection at all or do not qualify for the level of protection 5 initially asserted, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other parties that it is 6 withdrawing the mistaken designation. 7 6.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this 8 Stipulated Protective Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 6.2(a) below), or as otherwise 9 stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this 10 Stipulated Protective Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or 11 produced. 12 Designation in conformity with this Stipulated Protective Order requires the following: 13 (a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents, but 14 excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party 15 affix at a minimum the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 16 ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” to each page that contains protected material. If only a portion or 17 portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 18 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and must 19 specify, for each portion, the level of protection being asserted. 20 A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available for 21 inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated 22 which documents or material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before 23 the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “HIGHLY 24 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” After the inspecting Party has identified the 25 documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, 26 or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order. Then, before producing the specified 27 documents, the Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend (“CONFIDENTIAL” or 28 6 Case No. 2:23-CV-02283-FLA-MAA [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – Case No. 2:23-CV-02283 164294940.1 1 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”) to each page that contains 2 Protected Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, 3 the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 4 markings in the margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level of protection being asserted. 5 (b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings, that the 6 Designating Party identify the Disclosure or Discovery Material on the record, before the close of 7 the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, all protected testimony and specify the level of 8 protection being asserted. When it is impractical to identify separately each portion of testimony 9 that is entitled to protection and it appears that substantial portions of the testimony may qualify 10 for protection, the Designating Party may invoke on the record (before the deposition, hearing, or 11 other proceeding is concluded) a right to have up to 21 days to identify the specific portions of the 12 testimony as to which protection is sought and to specify the level of protection being asserted. 13 Only those portions of the testimony that are appropriately designated for protection within the 21 14 days shall be covered by the provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order. Alternatively, a 15 Designating Party may specify, at the deposition or up to 21 days afterwards if that period is 16 properly invoked, that the entire transcript shall be treated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY 17 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 18 Parties shall give the other parties notice if they reasonably expect a deposition, hearing or 19 other proceeding to include Protected Material so that the other parties can ensure that only 20 authorized individuals who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” 21 (Exhibit A) are present at those proceedings. The use of a document as an exhibit at a deposition 22 shall not in any way affect its designation as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL 23 – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 24 Transcripts containing Protected Material shall have an obvious legend on the title page 25 that the transcript contains Protected Material, and the title page shall be followed by a list of all 26 pages (including line numbers as appropriate) that have been designated as Protected Material and 27 the level of protection being asserted by the Designating Party. The Designating Party shall inform 28 7 Case No. 2:23-CV-02283-FLA-MAA [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – Case No. 2:23-CV-02283 164294940.1 1 the court reporter of these requirements. Any transcript that is prepared before the expiration of a 2 21-day period for designation shall be treated during that period as if it had been designated 3 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” in its entirety unless otherwise 4 agreed. After the expiration of that period, the transcript shall be treated only as actually 5 designated. 6 (c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and for any other 7 tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the container 8 or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or 9 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY. If only a portion or portions of the 10 information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall 11 identify the protected portion(s) and specify the level of protection being asserted. 12 6.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to 13 designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s 14 right to secure protection under this Stipulated Protective Order for such material. Upon timely 15 correction of a designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable efforts to assure that the 16 material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order. 17 7. 18 CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS 7.1 Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation of 19 confidentiality at any time that is consistent with the Court’s Scheduling Order. Unless a prompt 20 challenge to a Designating Party’s confidentiality designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable, 21 substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic burdens, or a significant disruption or delay of the 22 litigation, a Party does not waive its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not 23 to mount a challenge promptly after the original designation is disclosed. 24 7.2 Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution 25 process which shall comply with Local Rule 37.1 et seq., and with Section 4 of Judge Audero’s 26 Procedures (“Mandatory Telephonic Conference for Discovery Disputes”). The Challenging Party 27 shall give notice of intent to initiate dispute resolution by providing written notice of each 28 8 Case No. 2:23-CV-02283-FLA-MAA [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – Case No. 2:23-CV-02283 164294940.1 1 designation it is challenging and describing the basis for each challenge. To avoid ambiguity as to 2 whether a challenge has been made, the written notice must recite that the challenge to 3 confidentiality is being made in accordance with this specific paragraph of the Protective Order. 4 The parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in good faith and must begin the process by 5 conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other forms of communication are not sufficient) 6 within 14 days of the date of service of notice. In conferring, the Challenging Party must explain 7 the basis for its belief that the confidentiality designation was not proper and must give the 8 Designating Party an opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the 9 circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen 10 designation. A Challenging Party may proceed to the next stage of the challenge process, i.e. 11 Judge Audero’s procedure for “Request for Informal Discovery Conference” only if it has engaged 12 in this meet and confer process first or establishes that the Designating Party is unwilling to 13 participate in the meet and confer process in a timely manner. 14 7.3 Judicial Intervention. If the Parties cannot resolve a challenge without court 15 intervention, the Designating Party shall file and serve a motion to retain confidentiality under 16 Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5, if applicable) within 21 days of 17 the initial notice of challenge or within 14 days of the parties agreeing that the meet and confer 18 process will not resolve their dispute, whichever is earlier. Each such motion must be 19 accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has complied with the meet 20 and confer requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph. Failure by the Designating Party to 21 make such a motion including the required declaration within 21 days (or 14 days, if applicable) 22 shall automatically waive the confidentiality designation for each challenged designation. In 23 addition, the Challenging Party may file a motion challenging a confidentiality designation at any 24 time if there is good cause for doing so, including a challenge to the designation of a deposition 25 transcript or any portions thereof. Any motion brought pursuant to this provision must be 26 accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has complied with the meet 27 and confer requirements imposed by the preceding paragraph. 28 9 Case No. 2:23-CV-02283-FLA-MAA [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – Case No. 2:23-CV-02283 164294940.1 1 7.4 Burden of Persuasion. 2 The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating 3 Party. Frivolous challenges and those made for an improper purpose (e.g., to harass or impose 4 unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Challenging Party to 5 sanctions. Unless the Designating Party has waived or withdrawn the confidentiality designation 6 by failing to file a motion to retain confidentiality as described above, all parties shall continue to 7 afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing 8 Party’s designation until the court rules on the challenge. 9 8. 10 ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 8.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed or 11 produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this Action only for prosecuting, 12 defending, or attempting to settle this Action. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to 13 the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Stipulated Protective Order. 14 When the litigation has been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of 15 section 14 below (FINAL DISPOSITION). 16 Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and in 17 a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Stipulated 18 Protective Order. 19 8.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered 20 by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any 21 information or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to: 22 (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this Action, as well as employees 23 of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information 24 for this Action and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is 25 attached hereto as Exhibit A; 26 27 (b) the officers, directors, and employees (including In-House Counsel) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have signed the 28 10 Case No. 2:23-CV-02283-FLA-MAA [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – Case No. 2:23-CV-02283 164294940.1 1 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); 2 (c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is 3 reasonably necessary for this Action and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement 4 to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); 5 (d) the court and its personnel; 6 (e) court reporters and their staff, 7 (f) professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and Professional Vendors to whom 8 disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and 9 Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); 10 11 12 (g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information. (h) during their depositions, witnesses and attorneys of witnesses in the action to whom 13 disclosure is reasonably necessary provided: (i) the deposing party requests that the witness sign 14 the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); and (ii) the witness will not be 15 permitted to keep any confidential information unless they sign the “Acknowledgment and 16 Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or 17 ordered by the court. Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that 18 reveal Protected Material must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed 19 to anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order; and 20 21 22 (i) Any mediator or settlement officer, and their supporting personnel, mutually agreed upon by any of the parties engaged in settlement discussions. 8.3 Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” 23 Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the 24 Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated “HIGHLY 25 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” only to: 26 27 (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, as well as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the 28 11 Case No. 2:23-CV-02283-FLA-MAA [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – Case No. 2:23-CV-02283 164294940.1 1 information for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be 2 Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A; 3 (b) Designated In-House Counsel of the Receiving Party (1) who has no involvement 4 in competitive decision-making, (2) to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation, 5 (3) who has signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), and (4) as to 6 whom the procedures set forth in paragraph 8.4(a)(1), below, have been followed]; 7 (c) Experts of the Receiving Party (1) to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for 8 this litigation, (2) who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit 9 A), and (3) as to whom the procedures set forth in paragraph 8.4(a)(2), below, have been 10 followed]; 11 (d) the court and its personnel; 12 (e) court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, 13 and Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who 14 have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); and 15 16 17 (f) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information. 8.4 Procedures for Approving or Objecting to Disclosure of “HIGHLY 18 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or Items to Designated House 19 Counsel or Experts. 20 (a)(1) Unless otherwise ordered by the court or agreed to in writing by the Designating 21 Party, a Party that seeks to disclose to Designated House Counsel any information or item that has 22 been designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” pursuant to 23 paragraph 8.3(b) first must make a written request to the Designating Party that (1) sets forth the 24 full name of the Designated House Counsel and the city and state of his or her residence, and (2) 25 describes the Designated House Counsel’s current and reasonably foreseeable future primary job 26 duties and responsibilities in sufficient detail to determine if House Counsel is involved, or may 27 become involved, in any competitive decision-making. 28 12 Case No. 2:23-CV-02283-FLA-MAA [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – Case No. 2:23-CV-02283 164294940.1 1 (a)(2) Unless otherwise ordered by the court or agreed to in writing by the Designating 2 Party, a Party that seeks to disclose to an Expert (as defined in this Order) any information or item 3 that has been designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” pursuant 4 to paragraph 8.3(c) first must make a written request to the Designating Party that (1) identifies the 5 general categories of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information 6 that the Receiving Party seeks permission to disclose to the Expert, (2) sets forth the full name of 7 the Expert and the city and state of his or her primary residence, (3) attaches a copy of the Expert’s 8 current resume, (4) identifies the Expert’s current employer(s), (5) identifies each person or entity 9 from whom the Expert has received compensation or funding for work in his or her areas of 10 expertise or to whom the expert has provided professional services, including in connection with a 11 litigation, at any time during the preceding five years, and (6) identifies (by name and number of 12 the case, filing date, and location of court) any litigation in connection with which the Expert has 13 offered expert testimony, including through a declaration, report, or testimony at a deposition or 14 trial, during the preceding five years. 15 (b) A Party that makes a request and provides the information specified in the 16 preceding respective paragraphs may disclose the subject Protected Material to the identified 17 Designated House Counsel or Expert unless, within 14 days of delivering the request, the Party 18 receives a written objection from the Designating Party. Any such objection must set forth in 19 detail the grounds on which it is based. 20 (c) A Party that receives a timely written objection must meet and confer with the 21 Designating Party (through direct voice to voice dialogue) to try to resolve the matter by 22 agreement within seven days of the written objection. If no agreement is reached, the Party 23 seeking to make the disclosure to Designated House Counsel or the Expert may file a motion as 24 provided in Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5, if applicable) 25 seeking permission from the court to do so. Any such motion must describe the circumstances 26 with specificity, set forth in detail the reasons why the disclosure to Designated House Counsel or 27 the Expert is reasonably necessary, assess the risk of harm that the disclosure would entail, and 28 13 Case No. 2:23-CV-02283-FLA-MAA [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – Case No. 2:23-CV-02283 164294940.1 1 suggest any additional means that could be used to reduce that risk. In addition, any such motion 2 must be accompanied by a competent declaration describing the parties’ efforts to resolve the 3 matter by agreement (i.e., the extent and the content of the meet and confer discussions) and 4 setting forth the reasons advanced by the Designating Party for its refusal to approve the 5 disclosure. 6 In any such proceeding, the Party opposing disclosure to Designated House Counsel or 7 the Expert shall bear the burden of proving that the risk of harm that the disclosure would entail 8 (under the safeguards proposed) outweighs the Receiving Party’s need to disclose the Protected 9 Material to its Designated House Counsel or Expert. 10 9. 11 LITIGATION 12 PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that compels 13 disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL” or 14 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” that Party must: 15 16 (a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order; 17 (b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in 18 the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is subject to 19 this Stipulated Protective Order. Such notification shall include a copy of this Stipulated 20 Protective Order; and 21 22 23 (c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected. If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the subpoena 24 or court order shall not produce any information designated in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL” 25 or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” before a determination by the 26 court from which the subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating 27 Party’s permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection 28 14 Case No. 2:23-CV-02283-FLA-MAA [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – Case No. 2:23-CV-02283 164294940.1 1 in that court of its confidential material – and nothing in these provisions should be construed as 2 authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from 3 another court. 4 10. 5 LITIGATION A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE PRODUCED IN THIS 6 10.1 Application. The terms of this Stipulated Protective Order are applicable to 7 information produced by a Non-Party in this action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or 8 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”. Such information produced by 9 Non-Parties in connection with this litigation is protected by the remedies and relief provided by 10 this Order. Nothing in these provisions should be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from 11 seeking additional protections. 12 10.2 Notification. In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to 13 produce a Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is subject to an 14 agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s confidential information, then the 15 Party shall: 16 17 (a) promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party that some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement with a Non-Party; 18 (b) promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated Protective Order 19 in this Action, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably specific description of the 20 information requested; and 21 22 (c) make the information requested available for inspection by the Non-Party, if requested. 23 10.3 Conditions of Production. If the Non-Party fails to object or seek a protective 24 order from this court within fourteen (14) days of receiving the notice and accompanying 25 information, the Receiving Party may produce the Non-Party’s confidential information 26 responsive to the discovery request. If the Non-Party timely seeks a protective order, the 27 Receiving Party shall not produce any information in its possession or control that is subject to the 28 15 Case No. 2:23-CV-02283-FLA-MAA [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – Case No. 2:23-CV-02283 164294940.1 1 confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a determination by the court. Absent a court 2 order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in this 3 court of its Protected Material. 4 11. 5 UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected 6 Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective 7 Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (1) notify in writing the Designating Party of the 8 unauthorized disclosures, (2) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected 9 Material, (3) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the 10 terms of this Stipulated Protective Order, and (4) request such person or persons to execute the 11 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 12 12. 13 MATERIAL 14 INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain inadvertently 15 produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the 16 Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This 17 provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order 18 that provides for production without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 19 502(d) and (e), insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure of a 20 communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work product protection, 21 the parties may incorporate their agreement in the Stipulated Protective Order submitted to the 22 court. 23 13. 24 25 26 27 MISCELLANEOUS 13.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Stipulated Protective Order abridges the right of any person to seek its modification by the court in the future. 13.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Stipulated Protective Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or 28 16 Case No. 2:23-CV-02283-FLA-MAA [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – Case No. 2:23-CV-02283 164294940.1 1 producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective 2 Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of 3 the material covered by this Protective Order. 4 13.3 Filing Protected Material. Without written permission from the Designating Party 5 or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in 6 the public record in this action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any 7 Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5. Protected Material may only be filed 8 under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the specific Protected Material at 9 issue. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5, a sealing order will issue only upon a request 10 establishing that the Protected Material at issue is privileged, protectable as a trade secret, or 11 otherwise entitled to protection under the law. If a Receiving Party's request to file Protected 12 Material under seal pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(e) is denied by the court, then the Receiving 13 Party may file the Protected Material in the public record pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(e)(2) 14 unless otherwise instructed by the court. 15 14. 16 FINAL DISPOSITION Within 60 days after the final disposition of this action, as defined in paragraph 5, each 17 Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such material. 18 As used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, 19 summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. Whether 20 the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a written 21 certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party) 22 by the 60-day deadline that (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected 23 Material that was returned or destroyed and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained 24 any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or capturing any 25 of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival 26 copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts, legal memoranda, 27 correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work product, and 28 17 Case No. 2:23-CV-02283-FLA-MAA [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – Case No. 2:23-CV-02283 164294940.1 1 consultant and expert work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any such 2 archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Stipulated 3 Protective Order as set forth in Section 5 (DURATION). 4 15. VIOLATION 5 Any violation of this Stipulated Order may be punished by any and all appropriate 6 measures including, without limitation, contempt proceedings and/or monetary sanctions. 7 8 9 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that Counter-Defendants Robert Perkins and Northstar Design Group, LLC (together, the “Counter-Defendants”) and Counterclaimants Robert Carlson, 10 William Bettencourt, David Tanner, and Arbor Snowboards, Inc. (together, the 11 “Counterclaimants”) hereby stipulate to withdraw their previously-filed September 22, 2023 12 Proposed Stipulated Protective Order (Dkt. # 30). The Parties hereby re-submit this new proposed 13 protective order using Hon. Audero’s model order. 14 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 15 DATED: November 10, 2023 PERKINS COIE LLP 16 By: /s/ Donald Kula Donald J. Kula Javier F. Garcia M. Alejandra Jimenez Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Robert Perkins, and Counter-Defendants ALAN KIRK and NORTHSTAR DESIGN GROUP, LLC 17 18 19 20 21 22 DATED: November 10, 2023 BUCHALTER A Professional Corporation 23 By: /s/ Eric Kennedy Eric Kennedy Brian R. Shaw Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants ROBERT CARLSON, WILLIAM BETTENCOURT, DAVID TANNER and ARBOR SNOWBOARDS, INC. 24 25 26 27 28 18 Case No. 2:23-CV-02283-FLA-MAA [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – Case No. 2:23-CV-02283 164294940.1 1 2 3 4 SIGNATURE CERTIFICATION Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-4.3.4(a)(2)(i), the filer attests that all other signatories listed, and on whose behalf this filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing. DATED: November 10, 2023 PERKINS COIE LLP 5 By: /s/ Donald Kula Donald J. Kula Javier F. Garcia M. Alejandra Jimenez Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant ROBERT PERKINS, and Counter-Defendants ALAN KIRK and NORTHSTAR DESIGN GROUP, LLC. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 November 13 2023 DATED: ___________, Maria A. Audero UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 Case No. 2:23-CV-02283-FLA-MAA [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – Case No. 2:23-CV-02283 164294940.1 1 EXHIBIT A 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND I, 3 [print or type full name], of 4 [print or type full address], declare under penalty of 5 perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that 6 was issued by the United States District Court for the Central District of California on 7 ___________ in the case of Robert Perkins v. Robert Carlson, et al., Case No. 2:23-CV- 8 02283, I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective 9 Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to 10 sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not 11 disclose in any manner any information or item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective 12 Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance with the provisions of this Order. 13 I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the 14 Central District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated 15 Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this 16 action. I hereby appoint 17 [print or type full name] of 18 [print or type full address and 19 telephone number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with this 20 action or any proceedings related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order. 21 22 23 24 25 Date: City and State where sworn and signed: Printed name: 26 27 Signature: 28 20 Case No. 2:23-CV-02283-FLA-MAA [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER – Case No. 2:23-CV-02283 164294940.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?