Angel Men Chan v. Panera, LLC et al

Filing 102

ORDER REMANDING CASE by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court, having considered the Parties' Stipulation, and finding good cause therefor, hereby GRANTS the Stipulation and ORDERS as follows: 1. The Action is remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. 23STCV09024; and 2. All future dates and deadlines in this Action are hereby vacated, and the clerk is directed to administratively close this action. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (bm)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ANGEL MEN CHAN, an individual and 12 on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 16 PANERA, LLC, a Delaware limited 17 liability company; BEVERLY NGUYEN, an individual; and DOES 1 through 100, 18 inclusive, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants. CASE NO.: 2:23-cv-04194-JLS-AJR ORDER REMANDING CASE 1 On January 21, 2025, the Parties filed a joint stipulation to remand this Action to the 2 Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County. (Doc. 101.) The Court, having 3 considered the Parties’ Stipulation, and finding good cause therefor, hereby GRANTS the 4 Stipulation and ORDERS as follows: 5 6 7 8 1. The Action is remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. 23STCV09024; and 2. All future dates and deadlines in this Action are hereby vacated, and the clerk is directed to administratively close this action. 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 14 15 Dated: January 29, 2025 HON. JOSEPHINE L. STATON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?