Angel Men Chan v. Panera, LLC et al
Filing
102
ORDER REMANDING CASE by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court, having considered the Parties' Stipulation, and finding good cause therefor, hereby GRANTS the Stipulation and ORDERS as follows: 1. The Action is remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. 23STCV09024; and 2. All future dates and deadlines in this Action are hereby vacated, and the clerk is directed to administratively close this action. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (bm)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
ANGEL MEN CHAN, an individual and
12 on behalf of all others similarly situated,
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
16 PANERA, LLC, a Delaware limited
17 liability company; BEVERLY NGUYEN,
an individual; and DOES 1 through 100,
18 inclusive,
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Defendants.
CASE NO.: 2:23-cv-04194-JLS-AJR
ORDER REMANDING CASE
1
On January 21, 2025, the Parties filed a joint stipulation to remand this Action to the
2
Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County. (Doc. 101.) The Court, having
3
considered the Parties’ Stipulation, and finding good cause therefor, hereby GRANTS the
4
Stipulation and ORDERS as follows:
5
6
7
8
1. The Action is remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles,
Case No. 23STCV09024; and
2. All future dates and deadlines in this Action are hereby vacated, and the clerk is
directed to administratively close this action.
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
14
15
Dated: January 29, 2025
HON. JOSEPHINE L. STATON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?