Yu Xiulan v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
Filing
14
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. On September 23, 2024, Defendants filed a Notice of Mootness, indicating that Plaintiff had received the relief sought in the Complaint. ECF No. 13 at 1. The Court, having considered the Notice of Mootness and the Stipulation, hereby DISMISSES the action in its entirety with prejudice, with each side to bear its own costs and attorney's fees. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for further details) (yl)
1
2
JS-6, O
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
WESTERN DIVISION
11
12
Case No.: 2:23-cv-05905-MEMF-RAO
XIULAN YU,
Plaintiff,
13
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
v.
14
15
16
17
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, UNITED
STATES SECRETARY OF HOMELAND
SECURITY, ET AL.,
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
///
28
///
1
1
On August 28, 2023, the Parties filed the Joint Stipulation to Stay Case Pending Adjudication
2
of Application (“Stipulation”). ECF No. 10. The Court granted the Stipulation on August 30, 2023,
3
and stayed the action until December 20, 2024. In the Stipulation, the parties agreed that “[u]pon
4
receipt of the asylum application decision from the Los Angeles Asylum Office, Plaintiff Yu agrees
5
to voluntarily dismiss the case[ ] and . . . [e]ach party agrees to bear his, her, or its own litigation
6
costs, expenses, and attorneys fees.” Stipulation at ¶¶ 9–10.
7
8
9
On September 23, 2024, Defendants filed a Notice of Mootness, indicating that Plaintiff had
received the relief sought in the Complaint. ECF No. 13 at 1.
The Court, having considered the Notice of Mootness and the Stipulation, hereby
10
DISMISSES the action in its entirety with prejudice, with each side to bear its own costs and
11
attorney’s fees.
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
Dated: September 24, 2024
___________________________________
16
MAAME EWUSI-MENSAH FRIMPONG
17
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?