Nona Hatyan v. Sunbeam Products, Inc. et al

Filing 32

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled 31 , IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs and witho ut prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown by no later than 30 days, to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action without prejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)

1
2
3

JS-6

4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

NONA HATYAN,
Plaintiff,

11
12
13
14

v.
SUNBEAM PRODUCTS, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. CV 23-7416 FMO (MARx)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT
PREJUDICE

16

Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, (Dkt. 31,

17

Mediation Report), IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without

18

costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown by no later than 30 days, to re-

19

open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this

20

action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to re-open or seek an

21

extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall be deemed as

22

consent by the parties to dismissal of the action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link

23

v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962).

24

Dated this 27th day of March, 2024.

25
26
27
28

/s/
Fernando M. Olguin
United States District Judge