Meilian He v. David M Radel

Filing 17

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge George H. Wu. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The instant action shall be dismissed without prejudice; (See document for further details). (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (aco)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 MEILIAN HE, No. CV 23-7522-GW-BFMx Plaintiff, v. 15 DAVID M. RADEL, DIRECTOR OF ASYLUM OFFICE IN LOS 16 ANGELES, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DISMISSING CASE Honorable George H. Wu United States District Judge 1 2 Having read and considered the Joint Stipulation to Dismiss the Case submitted by the parties, and finding good cause therefor, 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The instant action shall be dismissed without prejudice; 5 2. USCIS shall interview Plaintiff on September 24, 2024, at 7:15 a.m., at the 6 Los Angeles Asylum Office in Tustin, California. USCIS intends to conduct 7 the interview on the date set, however, the parties understand that due to 8 unexpected staffing limitations or other unforeseen circumstances that may 9 arise, USCIS reserves its right to cancel and reschedule the interview. 10 Should rescheduling be necessary, the interview will be rescheduled within 11 four (4) weeks of the original interview date, absent unforeseen or 12 exceptional circumstances; 13 3. unforeseen or exceptional circumstances; 14 15 Plaintiff agrees to attend the interview on the date listed above, absent 4. If needed, Plaintiff agrees to only make one (1) interview reschedule request 16 and to notify the Los Angeles Asylum Office of the reschedule request, in 17 writing, prior to the scheduled interview date. Plaintiff may email the 18 reschedule request to; 19 5. If multiple reschedule requests are made by Plaintiff , USCIS may place the 20 asylum application back into the Los Angeles Asylum Office’s general 21 interview scheduling priorities. See 22 23 asylum/asylum/affirmative-asylum-interview-scheduling; 24 6. Plaintiff understands that additional interview(s) may be required by USCIS 25 as part of the asylum interview process and the adjudication of the 26 application; 27 28 7. USCIS agrees to diligently work towards completing adjudication of the asylum application within 120 days of completion of Plaintiff’s asylum 1 1 interview, absent unforeseen or exceptional circumstances that would 2 require additional time to complete adjudication; 3 8. In the event that USCIS does not complete adjudication of the asylum 4 application within 120 days of the completion of the asylum interview, 5 Plaintiff may refile this action; 6 9. Plaintiff agrees to submit all supplemental documents and evidence, if any, 7 to USCIS prior to the agreed upon scheduled interview based on the 8 following timelines. Plaintiff may email any supplemental documents to 9 at least seven (7) calendar days before 10 the interview. Alternatively, Plaintiff may mail the supplemental documents 11 to the Los Angeles Asylum Office, P.O. Box 2003, Tustin, CA 92781-2003, 12 postmarked no later than ten (10) calendar days prior to the scheduled 13 asylum interview. Plaintiff recognizes that failure to submit these 14 documents in a timely manner may result in the interview being rescheduled 15 at no fault of USCIS; 16 17 10. Each party agrees to bear the party’s own litigation costs, expenses, and attorney fees. 18 19 Dated: November 15, 2023. 20 21 22 ____________________________________ HONORABLE GEORGE H. WU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?