Nan Bu v. David M. Radel

Filing 11

ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer Dismissing Case 10 . See Order for specifics. Each party agrees to bear it's the party's own litigation costs, expenses, andattorney fees. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13
14
15
16

No. 2:23-cv-8237-DSF-AS

NAN BU,
Plaintiff, Pro Se
v.

17 DAVID M. RADEL, U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration Services Los Angeles
18
Asylum Office Director,
19
Defendant.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ORDER DISMISSING CASE
Honorable Dale S. Fischer
United States District Judge

1
2

Having read and considered the Joint Stipulation to Dismiss the Case submitted by
the parties, and finding good cause therefor,

3

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

4

1.

The instant action shall be dismissed without prejudice;

5

2.

USCIS shall interview Plaintiff, Dan Zhao, on October 17, 2024, at 6:15

6

a.m., at the Los Angeles Asylum Office in Tustin, California. USCIS

7

intends to conduct the interview on the date set, however, the parties

8

understand that due to unexpected staffing limitations or other unforeseen

9

circumstances that may arise, USCIS reserves its right to cancel and

10

reschedule the interview. Should rescheduling be necessary, the interview

11

will be rescheduled within four (4) weeks of the original interview date,

12

absent unforeseen or exceptional circumstances;

13

3.

unforeseen or exceptional circumstances;

14
15

Plaintiff agrees to attend the interview on the date listed above, absent

4.

If needed, Plaintiff agrees to only make one (1) interview reschedule request

16

and to notify the Los Angeles Asylum Office of the reschedule request, in

17

writing, prior to the scheduled interview date. Plaintiff may email the

18

reschedule request to [e-mail];

19

5.

If multiple reschedule requests are made by Plaintiff, USCIS may place the

20

asylum application back into the Los Angeles Asylum Office’s general

21

interview

22

https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-and-

23

asylum/asylum/affirmative-asylum-interview-scheduling;

24

6.

scheduling

priorities.

See

Plaintiff understands that additional interview(s) may be required by USCIS

25

as part of the asylum interview process and the adjudication of the

26

application;

27
28

7.

USCIS agrees to diligently work towards completing adjudication of the
asylum application within 120 days of completion of Plaintiff’s asylum
1

1

interview, absent unforeseen or exceptional circumstances that would

2

require additional time to complete adjudication;

3

8.

In the event that USCIS does not complete adjudication of the asylum

4

application within 120 days of the completion of the asylum interview,

5

Plaintiff may refile this action;

6

9.

Plaintiff agrees to submit all supplemental documents and evidence, if any,

7

to USCIS prior to the agreed upon scheduled interview based on the

8

following timelines. Plaintiff may email any supplemental documents to

9

[e-mail] at least seven (7) calendar days before

10

the interview. Alternatively, Plaintiff may mail the supplemental documents

11

to the Los Angeles Asylum Office, P.O. Box 2003, Tustin, CA 92781-2003,

12

postmarked no later than ten (10) calendar days prior to the scheduled

13

asylum interview. Plaintiff recognizes that failure to submit these

14

documents in a timely manner may result in the interview being rescheduled

15

at no fault of USCIS;

16
17

10.

Each party agrees to bear it’s the party’s own litigation costs, expenses, and
attorney fees.

18
19

Dated: November 13, 2023

20
21
22

____________________________________
S. FISCHER
HONORABLE DALE S
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

23
24
25
26
27
28
2