Kevin Murphy Dunbar v. Facebook.com et al

Filing 10

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver: Plaintiff initiated this lawsuit on November 8, 2023. Dkt. No. 1. On December 18, 2023, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Amend Civil Complaint. Dkt. No. 6. The Court granted Plaintiff' ;s Motion to Amend on March 5, 2024. Dkt. No. 9. The Court set a deadline of April 2, 2024 for Plaintiff to file his amended complaint. Id. To date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than July 5, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (See attached order) (jm)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No.:
Title:

CV 23-09603 VBF (RAO)
Kevin Murphy Dunbar v. Facebook.com et al.

Present:

Date:

June 5, 2024

The Honorable ROZELLA A. OLIVER, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
James Muñoz
Deputy Clerk

N/A
Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s):

Attorneys Present for Defendant(s):

N/A

N/A

Proceedings:

(In Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Plaintiff initiated this lawsuit on November 8, 2023. Dkt. No. 1. On December 18, 2023,
Plaintiff filed a Motion to Amend Civil Complaint. Dkt. No. 6. The Court granted Plaintiff’s
Motion to Amend on March 5, 2024. Dkt. No. 9. The Court set a deadline of April 2, 2024 for
Plaintiff to file his amended complaint. Id. To date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.
Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than July 5, 2024, why this action should
not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Alternatively, Plaintiff may file his
amended complaint or a response indicating that he wishes to proceed on his original complaint
by the same deadline. Plaintiff is reminded that the amended pleading must be complete and
should not refer to prior pleadings. See L.R. 15-2. To the extent Plaintiff intended his December
18, 2023 filing to be considered together with his original complaint as an amended pleading, the
Court will not consider two separate filings together as an amended pleading. Plaintiff is
expressly advised that failure to timely file a response to this Order will result in a
recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Initials of Preparer

CV-90 (05/15)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

:
jm

Page 1 of 1