Teresa Arasheben v. Sprouts Farmers Market, LLC

Filing 48

ORDER GRANTING THE PARTIES' STIPULATION TO REMAND CASE TO STATE COURT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court, having read and considered the parties' Stipulation to Remand, hereby ORDERS as follows: 1. Pursuant to the parties' Stipulat ion, because complete diversity does not, this Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction and the matter is hereby REMANDED to the Superior Court for the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No.: 23CHCV02681. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (rolm)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

TERESA ARASHEBEN,
Plaintiff,
12
11

13

vs.

14

SPROUTS FARMERS MARKET,
LLC, WORLD VARIETY PRODUCE,
16 INC., and DOES 1 to 50 inclusive,
Defendants.
17
15

Case No.: 2:23-CV-09920-AB-PDx
[Los Angeles County Case No.:
23CHCV02681]
[Assigned to District Judge André Birotte
Jr.]
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THE
PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO REMAND
CASE TO STATE COURT

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

The Court, having read and considered the parties’ Stipulation to Remand,
hereby ORDERS as follows:
1.

Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation, because complete diversity does not,

this Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction and the matter is hereby
REMANDED to the Superior Court for the State of California, County of Los Angeles,
Case No.: 23CHCV02681. This Order shall be accorded full force and effect in the
Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No.:
23CHCV02681.
-1-

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO
REMAND CASE TO STATE COURT

1

2.

All pending dates in the Federal action are hereby vacated.

2
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5
6
7

Dated: September 23, 2024

______________________________
Hon. André Birotte Jr.
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO
REMAND CASE TO STATE COURT