Guadalupe Triner v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al

Filing 43

[STRICKEN SEE DKT. 45 ] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 41 by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. The Court, having reviewed the moving papers orders as follows: 1) Good Cause Appearing, the Court hereby approves this Stipulated Protective Order. (es) Modified on 10/23/2024 (es).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 GUADALUPE TRINER, 13 Plaintiff, 14 vs. 15 CASE NO: 2:23-CV-10688-PAMAA [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 16 17 18 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, 19 20 Defendant. 21 22 The Court, having reviewed the moving papers orders as follows: 23 1) Good Cause Appearing, the Court hereby approves this Stipulated 24 25 26 27 28 Protective Order. /// /// /// 1 _______________________________________________________________________________________ [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO: 2:23-CV-10688-PA-MAA 1 2 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 10/23/2024 Maria A. Audero United States Magistrate Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 Submitted by: DEBORAH S. TROPP, ESQ. – BAR NO. 162613 KEVIN J. CASTELLANOS, ESQ. – BAR NO. 351587 McNEIL TROPP & BRAUN LLP 4695 MacArthur Court, Suite 800 Newport Beach, California 92660 Phone: (949) 259-2890 Fax: (949) 259-2891 Attorneys for Defendant, COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 _______________________________________________________________________________________ [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO: 2:23-CV-10688-PA-MAA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify on October 22, 2024 I electronically filed the foregoing: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER with the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court, Central District of California by using the Central District CM/ECF system. Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by the USDC-Central District of California CM/ECF system. 8 9 10 11 12 I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, it would be deposited with the United States Postal Service on that same day, with postage thereon fully prepaid at Irvine, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing an affidavit. 13 14 FEDERAL: I declare under penalty of perjury in accordance with 28 U.S.C. Section 1746 that the foregoing is true and correct. 15 16 17 18 Executed on October 22, 2024, at Newport Beach, California. /s/ Kevin J. Castellanos Kevin J. Castellanos, Esq. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 _______________________________________________________________________________________ [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO: 2:23-CV-10688-PA-MAA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?