Guadalupe Triner v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
Filing
43
[STRICKEN SEE DKT. 45 ] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 41 by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. The Court, having reviewed the moving papers orders as follows: 1) Good Cause Appearing, the Court hereby approves this Stipulated Protective Order. (es) Modified on 10/23/2024 (es).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
GUADALUPE TRINER,
13
Plaintiff,
14
vs.
15
CASE NO: 2:23-CV-10688-PAMAA
[PROPOSED] ORDER
GRANTING STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
16
17
18
COSTCO WHOLESALE
CORPORATION,
19
20
Defendant.
21
22
The Court, having reviewed the moving papers orders as follows:
23
1) Good Cause Appearing, the Court hereby approves this Stipulated
24
25
26
27
28
Protective Order.
///
///
///
1
_______________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO: 2:23-CV-10688-PA-MAA
1
2
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 10/23/2024
Maria A. Audero
United States Magistrate Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
Submitted by:
DEBORAH S. TROPP, ESQ. – BAR NO. 162613
KEVIN J. CASTELLANOS, ESQ. – BAR NO. 351587
McNEIL TROPP & BRAUN LLP
4695 MacArthur Court, Suite 800
Newport Beach, California 92660
Phone: (949) 259-2890
Fax: (949) 259-2891
Attorneys for Defendant, COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
_______________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO: 2:23-CV-10688-PA-MAA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify on October 22, 2024 I electronically filed the
foregoing: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER with the Clerk of the Court for the United States
District Court, Central District of California by using the Central District
CM/ECF system.
Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be
served by the USDC-Central District of California CM/ECF system.
8
9
10
11
12
I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection and
processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, it would be
deposited with the United States Postal Service on that same day, with postage
thereon fully prepaid at Irvine, California in the ordinary course of business.
I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if
postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date
of deposit for mailing an affidavit.
13
14
FEDERAL: I declare under penalty of perjury in accordance with 28
U.S.C. Section 1746 that the foregoing is true and correct.
15
16
17
18
Executed on October 22, 2024, at Newport Beach, California.
/s/ Kevin J. Castellanos
Kevin J. Castellanos, Esq.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
_______________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO: 2:23-CV-10688-PA-MAA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?