Albert Anthony Ponce v. Martin J. O Malley

Filing 17

JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin, Related to: ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY REMAND TO AGENCY PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g) 16 . IT ISHEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the terms of the Stipulation to Remand. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (et)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 E. MARTIN ESTRADA United States Attorney 2 DAVID M. HARRIS 3 Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Division 4 CEDINA M. KIM 5 Assistant United States Attorney Senior Litigation Counsel, Civil Division 6 MARLA K. LETELLIER, CSBN 234969 7 Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration 8 Office of the General Counsel 9 Office of Program Litigation, Division 7 6401 Security Boulevard 10 Baltimore, Maryland 21235 Telephone: (510) 970-4830 11 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 12 E-mail: marla.letellier@ssa.gov 13 Attorneys for Defendant 14 15 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION—LOS ANGELES 18 ALBERT ANTHONY PONCE, 19 Plaintiff, 20 21 v. 22 MARTIN O’MALLEY, 23 Commissioner of Social Security, 24 25 26 27 28 Defendant. CASE NO. 2:24-cv-01036-AJR [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF REMAND 1 2 3 4 5 6 The Court having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment (“Stipulation to Remand”) lodged concurrently with the Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the terms of the Stipulation to Remand. 7 8 9 10 DATED: 7/9/24 11 HON. A.. JOEL JO OEL RICHLIN RICH HLIN UNITED D STATES MAGISTRATE MAGISTRAT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT CASE NO. 2:24-CV-01036-AJR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?