Erisat-Eritrean Satellite Television v. Henok Tekle Gebrekidan et al

Filing 19

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Plaintiff Erisat-Eritrean Satellite Television shall personally serve the Order re Motion for Preliminary Injunction ("MPI") #2 and this Preliminary Injunction Order on Defendant Henok Tekle Gebrekidan, and shall file a Proof of Service within three days of such service. This injunction goes into effect as soon as proper service is effectuated and shall remain in effect until final judgment is entered. See document for further details. (gk)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

WESTERN DIVISION

11
12 ERISAT-ERITREAN SATELLITE
TELEVISION,
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
HENOK TEKLE GEBREKIDAN; and
16 ERISAT FOR JUSTICE,
17
Defendants.

Case No. CV 24-1121-DMG (AJRx)
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

18
19
20
21
22
23

This matter came before the Court on Plaintiff Erisat-Eritrean Satellite
Television’s (“EEST”) Motion for Preliminary Injunction. [Doc. # 2 (“MPI”).] Neither
Defendant Henok Tekle Gebrekidan nor Erisat for Justice entered an appearance in the
case, nor did they file any Opposition to the MPI. The Court has duly considered
EEST’s briefs, evidence, and argument, and has granted the MPI.

24

The Court has found that issuance of a preliminary injunction is warranted. EEST

25

has demonstrated that the law and facts clearly favor its position on its conversion claim

26

and it is likely to suffer irreparable injury in the absence of a preliminary injunction.

27

See Order re MPI at 4–5 (citing Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20

28
1