Erisat-Eritrean Satellite Television v. Henok Tekle Gebrekidan et al

Filing 19

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Plaintiff Erisat-Eritrean Satellite Television shall personally serve the Order re Motion for Preliminary Injunction ("MPI") #2 and this Preliminary Injunction Order on Defendant Henok Tekle Gebrekidan, and shall file a Proof of Service within three days of such service. This injunction goes into effect as soon as proper service is effectuated and shall remain in effect until final judgment is entered. See document for further details. (gk)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 12 ERISAT-ERITREAN SATELLITE TELEVISION, 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 HENOK TEKLE GEBREKIDAN; and 16 ERISAT FOR JUSTICE, 17 Defendants. Case No. CV 24-1121-DMG (AJRx) PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 18 19 20 21 22 23 This matter came before the Court on Plaintiff Erisat-Eritrean Satellite Television’s (“EEST”) Motion for Preliminary Injunction. [Doc. # 2 (“MPI”).] Neither Defendant Henok Tekle Gebrekidan nor Erisat for Justice entered an appearance in the case, nor did they file any Opposition to the MPI. The Court has duly considered EEST’s briefs, evidence, and argument, and has granted the MPI. 24 The Court has found that issuance of a preliminary injunction is warranted. EEST 25 has demonstrated that the law and facts clearly favor its position on its conversion claim 26 and it is likely to suffer irreparable injury in the absence of a preliminary injunction. 27 See Order re MPI at 4–5 (citing Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?