Uresh Patel et al v. City of Los Angeles et al

Filing 12

MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 6/19/2024. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (clee)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No.

CV 24-01669-SK

Date: June 5, 2024

Title

Uresh Patel et al v. City of Los Angeles et al

Present: The Honorable: Steve Kim, United States Magistrate Judge
Connie Chung
Deputy Clerk

n/a
Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s):

Attorneys Present for Defendant(s):

None present

None present

Proceedings:

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL
FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

For the reason checked below, Plaintiffs are ORDERED to show cause on or
before June 19, 2024 why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for
lack of prosecution on its own motion).
x

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without
prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a Defendant
within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Plaintiffs have failed to file a
proof of service within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint on
Defendants City of Los Angeles, Rocky Patel, Bhavna Rocky Patel, and
RBS Empire LLC.
Plaintiffs can satisfy this order by showing that service was effectuated
within the 90 day deadline or by showing good cause for the failure to do
so. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).

Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that
this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show
Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiffs’ response. Failure to respond to
this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

CV-90 (03/15)

Civil Minutes – General

Page 1 of 1