Uresh Patel et al v. City of Los Angeles et al

Filing 13

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim, re Order to Show Cause 12 . No timely response having been filed to the Court's Order to Show Cause, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the complaint (ECF 1) is dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of the Court. (see document for further details) Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (hr)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JS-6 CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL Case No. CV 24-01669-SK Date: July 2, 2024 Title Uresh Patel et al v. City of Los Angeles et al Present: The Honorable: Steve Kim, United States Magistrate Judge Connie Chung Deputy Clerk n/a Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorneys Present for Defendant(s): None present None present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT On June 5, 2024, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (ECF 12). A response to the Order to Show Cause was ordered to be filed no later than June 19, 2024. No timely response having been filed to the Court’s Order to Show Cause, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the complaint (ECF 1) is dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of the Court. See L.R. 41. IT IS SO ORDERED. CV-90 (03/15) Civil Minutes – General Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?