Bruce Dwain Copeland v. Brian C Ostler, Sr et al
Filing
16
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT DISMISS THE ACTION FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: On March 1, 2024, Plaintiff filed the Complaint against Defendants. Dkt. 1. On May 1, 2024, the court struck Plaintiff's M otion for Default Judgment, Dkt. 12, for failure to comply with the Local Rules. Dkt. 14. Since then Plaintiff has not filed any motion, application, or document on the docket. Accordingly, the court ORDERS Plaintiff to Show Cause in writing within twenty-one (21) days of this order why the court should not dismiss this action for lack of prosecution. Failure to respond timely may result in the dismissal of this action without further notice. (lc)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BRUCE DWAIN COPELAND,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
BRIAN C. OSTLER, SR., et al.,
Case No. 2:24-cv-01717-FLA (SKx)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
THE COURT SHOULD NOT
DISMISS THE ACTION FOR LACK
OF PROSECUTION
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
1
On March 1, 2024, Plaintiff filed the Complaint against Defendants. Dkt. 1.
2
On May 1, 2024, the court struck Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment, Dkt. 12, for
3
failure to comply with the Local Rules. Dkt. 14. Since then Plaintiff has not filed any
4
motion, application, or document on the docket.
5
Accordingly, the court ORDERS Plaintiff to Show Cause (“OSC”) in writing
6
within twenty-one (21) days of this order why the court should not dismiss this action
7
for lack of prosecution. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Failure to respond timely may
8
result in the dismissal of this action without further notice.
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
Dated: January 29, 2025
_______________________________
FERNANDO L. AENLLE-ROCHA
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?