Bruce Dwain Copeland v. Brian C Ostler, Sr et al

Filing 16

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT DISMISS THE ACTION FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: On March 1, 2024, Plaintiff filed the Complaint against Defendants. Dkt. 1. On May 1, 2024, the court struck Plaintiff's M otion for Default Judgment, Dkt. 12, for failure to comply with the Local Rules. Dkt. 14. Since then Plaintiff has not filed any motion, application, or document on the docket. Accordingly, the court ORDERS Plaintiff to Show Cause in writing within twenty-one (21) days of this order why the court should not dismiss this action for lack of prosecution. Failure to respond timely may result in the dismissal of this action without further notice. (lc)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRUCE DWAIN COPELAND, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 v. BRIAN C. OSTLER, SR., et al., Case No. 2:24-cv-01717-FLA (SKx) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT DISMISS THE ACTION FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 1 On March 1, 2024, Plaintiff filed the Complaint against Defendants. Dkt. 1. 2 On May 1, 2024, the court struck Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment, Dkt. 12, for 3 failure to comply with the Local Rules. Dkt. 14. Since then Plaintiff has not filed any 4 motion, application, or document on the docket. 5 Accordingly, the court ORDERS Plaintiff to Show Cause (“OSC”) in writing 6 within twenty-one (21) days of this order why the court should not dismiss this action 7 for lack of prosecution. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Failure to respond timely may 8 result in the dismissal of this action without further notice. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 Dated: January 29, 2025 _______________________________ FERNANDO L. AENLLE-ROCHA United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?