John Doe T.F. v. Airbnb, Inc. et al

Filing 16

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO REMAND ACTION 15 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha : 1. The above-captioned matter is hereby remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles; and 2. The courts Order to Show Cause Why Action Should Not Be Remanded for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, issued March 11, 2024 (Dkt. 12), is DISCHARGED. Case remaned to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case number 24NNCV00049.Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (lc)

JS-6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOHN DOE T.F., an individual,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15
16
17

v.

Case No. 2:24-cv-01791-FLA (PVCx)
ORDER APPROVING
STIPULATION TO REMAND
ACTION [DKT. 15]

AIRBNB, INC., a Delaware corporation;
LUIS ERNESTO HERNANDEZ, an
individual; and DOES 1-50, inclusive,
Defendants.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

1

On March 22, 2024, Plaintiff John Doe T.F. and Defendant Airbnb, Inc. filed a

2

Stipulation to Remand Action (“Stipulation”). Dkt. 15. Based on Plaintiff’s

3

representation that he would not seek more than $75,000 from Defendants if the action

4

is remanded, the parties agree the amount in controversy does not exceed $75,000 and

5

that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. Id. at 2.

6
7
8

The court, having considered the parties’ Stipulation, and finding good cause
therefor, hereby APPROVES the Stipulation and ORDERS as follows:
1.

9
10

The above-captioned matter is hereby remanded to the Superior Court of
California, County of Los Angeles; and

2.

The court’s Order to Show Cause Why Action Should Not Be Remanded

11

for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, issued March 11, 2024 (Dkt. 12),

12

is DISCHARGED.

13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.

15
16

Dated: March 22, 2024

______________________________
FERNANDO L. AENLLE-ROCHA
United States District Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2