Jinniffer Kazimi v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. et al.

Filing 16

ORDER RE PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner re Stipulation for Protective Order 15 . The Court accepts and ENTERS the proposed order subject to the following: (see document for details). (hr)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV 24-2361 AB (MRWx) Title Kazimi v. Sedgwick Claims Mgmt Serv. Present: The Honorable Date July 3, 2024 Michael R. Wilner Eddie Ramirez n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant: None present None present Proceedings: ORDER RE: PROTECTIVE ORDER The parties submitted a proposed protective order regarding discovery in this civil action. (Docket # 15.) The Court accepts and ENTERS the proposed order subject to the following: 1. ¶ 6.3 – Any challenge to a confidentiality designation must comply in full with the joint filing format described in Local Rule 37 for all discovery motions. 2. ¶ 1 – The parties failed to provide the Court with an adequate statement of good cause regarding the litigation. See Oliner v. Kontrabecki, 745 F. 3d 1024, 1026 (9th Cir. 2014). As stated in the Court’s preferred proposed protective order (available online at Judge Wilner’s procedures page at cacd.uscourts.gov), the parties must identify legitimate bases for the entry of such an order that are specific to this action; no boilerplate allowed. The entry of this order is contingent on the filing of such a statement within five court days. CV-90 (10/08) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?