Board of Trustees of the California Ironworkers Field Pension Trust et al v. Shea Reinforcing Steel, Inc.

Filing 18

JUDGMENT, 17 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson, in favor of Board of Trustees of the California Field Ironworkers Administrative Trust, Board of Trustees of the California Field Ironworkers Apprenticeship Training and Journeyman Retraining Fund, Board of Trustees of the California Field Ironworkers Labor Management Cooperative Trust Fund, Board of Trustees of the California Field Ironworkers Vacation Trust Fund, Board of Trustees of the California Ironworkers Field Defined Contribution Pension Trust Fund, Board of Trustees of the California Ironworkers Field Pension Trust, Board of Trustees of the California Ironworkers Field Welfare Trust, Board of Trustees of the Ironworkers Workers Compensation Trust against Shea Reinforcing Steel, Inc. Re C ontributions in the amount of $45,304.62, interest in the amount of $2,775.96, attorneys fees of $4,076.76, costs of $662.50 for a total judgment of $66,658.26. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, Defendant Shea Reinforcing Steel, Inc. shall submit to Plaintiffs its books and records for January 2023 to the present. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (shb)

1

JS-6

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

)
CALIFORNIA IRONWORKERS
)
FIELD PENSION TRUST, BOARD )
OF TRUSTEES OF THE
)
CALIFORNIA IRONWORKERS
FIELD WELFARE TRUST, BOARD )
OF TRUSTEES OF THE
)
CALIFORNIA FIELD
)
IRONWORKERS VACATION
)
TRUST FUND, BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA )
FIELD IRONWORKERS
)
APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING
)
AND JOURNEYMAN
RETRAINING FUND, BOARD OF )
TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA )
IRONWORKERS FIELD DEFINED )
CONTRIBUTION PENSION
)
TRUST FUND, BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA )
)
FIELD IRONWORKERS
ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST,
)
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE )
CALIFORNIA FIELD
)
IRONWORKERS LABOR
MANAGEMENT COOPERATIVE )
TRUST FUND, AND BOARD OF )
TRUSTEES OF THE
)
IRONWORKERS WORKERS’
)
COMPENSATION TRUST,
)
)
Plaintiffs,

CASE NO. 2:24cv02949 DDP(MAAx)
Assigned to Hon. Dean D. Pregerson
JUDGMENT AGAINST
DEFENDANT SHEA
REINFORCING STEEL INC.
Hearing Date: August 26, 2024
Hearing Time: 10:00 a.m.
Judge: Hon. Dean D. Pregerson
Place: Courtroom 9C
Complaint filed: April 11, 2024
Trail date: None

-1[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT
CASE NO. 2:24-CV-02949-DDP-MAA

1

v.

2

3 SHEA REINFORCING STEEL,
4

INC., a California corporation.
Defendant.

5
6

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

7
8

This Court has granted Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment by Plaintiffs, the

9 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA IRONWORKERS FIELD
10 PENSION

TRUST,

BOARD

OF

TRUSTEES

OF

THE

CALIFORNIA

11 IRONWORKERS FIELD WELFARE TRUST, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
12 CALIFORNIA FIELD IRONWORKERS VACATION TRUST FUND, BOARD OF
13 TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA FIELD IRONWORKERS APPRENTICESHIP
14 TRAINING AND JOURNEYMAN RETRAINING FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES
15 OF THE CALIFORNIA IRONWORKERS FIELD DEFINED CONTRIBUTION
16 PENSION TRUST FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA FIELD
17 IRONWORKERS ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
18 CALIFORNIA

FIELD

IRONWORKERS

LABOR

19 COOPERATIVE

TRUST FUND, and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE

20 IRONWORKERS WORKERS’ COMPENSATION TRUST

MANAGEMENT
(“Plaintiffs”) against

21 Defendant SHEA REINFORCING STEEL INC., a California corporation.
22

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT PLAINTIFFS shall recover from

23 DEFENDANT:
24 ///
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28
-2[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT
CASE NO. 2:24-CV-02949-DDP-MAA

1

Contributions:

$45,304.62

2

Liquidated Damages:

$13,838.43

3

Interest:

$2,775.96

4

Attorney’s Fees:

$4,076.76

5

Costs:

$662.50

6

Total Judgment:

$66,658.26

7
8

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, Defendant Shea Reinforcing Steel, Inc. shall

9 submit to Plaintiffs its books and records for January 2023 to the present.
10

Judgment is entered on this 26th day of August, 2024.

11
12 Dated: August 26, 2024
13

__
___
HON. DEAN D. PERGERSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT
CASE NO. 2:24-CV-02949-DDP-MAA