Yolanda Penaloza Duarte et al v. Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Filing
9
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Percy Anderson. The court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before September 4, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (iv)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
CV 24-4234 PA (JPRx)
Title
Yolanda Penaloza Duarte et al v. Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Present: The
Honorable
Date
August 28, 2024
PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Kamilla Sali-Suleyman
Not Reported
N/A
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter
Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
None
None
Proceedings:
Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal For Lack Of Prosecution
Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the
summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 90 days after the complaint is
filed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).
In the present case, it appears that this time period has not been met. Accordingly, the
court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before September 4,
2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for
submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the
filing of plaintiff’s response. Failure to respond to this Order may result in the imposition of
sanctions, including but not limited to dismissal of the complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
:
Initials of Preparer
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
KSS
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?