Natascha Lindemann v. OPTO Aesthetics Inc. et al
Filing
25
JUDGMENT ON MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson, Related to: Order on Motion for Default Judgment, 24 Having considered all matters of record, the arguments of counsel, and the applicable legal authorities, it is hereby ORD ERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: 1. Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment [Dkt. # 18] is GRANTED; 2. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504, 17 U.S.C. § 505; 3. Defendant is hereby ordered to pay statutory damages for infringement pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504 in the amount of $3,757.33; 4. Defendant is hereby ordered to pay Plaintiff's reasonable attorneys fees pursuant 17 U.S.C. § 505 in the amount of $4,005; 5. Defendant is hereby ordered to pay Plaintiff's costs pursuant 17 U.S.C. § 505 in the amount of $1,030; 6. Post-judgment interest shall accrue at the rate of.70% per annum, in accordance with 28 U.S .C. § 1961, from the date of entry of this Default Judgment until the Judgment Amount and all accrued interest are paid in full by Defendant to the Plaintiff; and, 7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Default Judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mathew K. Higbee, Esq. SBN 241380
HIGBEE & ASSOCIATES
3110 W Cheyenne Ave Ste 200,
North Las Vegas, NV 89032
(813) 710-3013
(714) 597-6559 facsimile
Email: mhigbee@higbee.law
JS-6
Attorney for Plaintiff,
NATASCHA LINDEMANN
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
NATASCHA LINDEMANN,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
Case No. 2:24-cv-04688 DDP (MAAx)
v.
OPTO AESTHETICS INC d/b/a
AESDERMA MED SPA, and
DOES 1 through 10 inclusive,
17
Defendants.
18
JUDGMENT ON MOTION FOR
DEFAULT JUDGMENT
Judge: Hon. Dean. D. Pregerson
Courtroom: 9C
Hearing Date: February 24, 2025 at
10:00AM
19
20
JUDGMENT
21
This case is before the Court on Plaintiff Natascha Lindemann (“Plaintiff”)
22
Motion for Entry of Default Judgment (“Motion”) [Dkt. # 18], seeking default
23
judgment against Opto Aesthetics Inc. d/b/a Aesderma Med Spa (“Defendant”). The
24
Clerk of the Court for the Central District of California entered the default of
25
Defendant on November 15, 2023 [Dkt. # 17].
26
Having considered all matters of record, the arguments of counsel, and the
27
applicable legal authorities, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and
28
DECREED as follows:
1
JUDGEMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment [Dkt. # 18] is GRANTED;
2. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant
pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504, 17 U.S.C. § 505;
3. Defendant is hereby ordered to pay statutory damages for infringement
pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504 in the amount of $3,757.33;
4. Defendant is hereby ordered to pay Plaintiff’s reasonable attorneys fees
pursuant 17 U.S.C. § 505 in the amount of $4,005;
5. Defendant is hereby ordered to pay Plaintiff’s costs pursuant 17 U.S.C. § 505
in the amount of $1,030;
10
6. Post-judgment interest shall accrue at the rate of .70% per annum, in
11
accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1961, from the date of entry of this Default
12
Judgment until the Judgment Amount and all accrued interest are paid in full
13
by Defendant to the Plaintiff; and,
14
15
7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing
the terms of this Default Judgment.
16
There being no just reason for delay in the entry of this Default Judgment, the
17
Court hereby directs the clerk to enter judgment against Defendant pursuant to Rule
18
54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
19
20
21
Dated: March 11, 2025
__
____
HON. DEAN D. PREGERSON
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
JUDGEMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?