Natascha Lindemann v. OPTO Aesthetics Inc. et al

Filing 25

JUDGMENT ON MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson, Related to: Order on Motion for Default Judgment, 24 Having considered all matters of record, the arguments of counsel, and the applicable legal authorities, it is hereby ORD ERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: 1. Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment [Dkt. # 18] is GRANTED; 2. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504, 17 U.S.C. § 505; 3. Defendant is hereby ordered to pay statutory damages for infringement pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504 in the amount of $3,757.33; 4. Defendant is hereby ordered to pay Plaintiff's reasonable attorneys fees pursuant 17 U.S.C. § 505 in the amount of $4,005; 5. Defendant is hereby ordered to pay Plaintiff's costs pursuant 17 U.S.C. § 505 in the amount of $1,030; 6. Post-judgment interest shall accrue at the rate of.70% per annum, in accordance with 28 U.S .C. § 1961, from the date of entry of this Default Judgment until the Judgment Amount and all accrued interest are paid in full by Defendant to the Plaintiff; and, 7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Default Judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Mathew K. Higbee, Esq. SBN 241380 HIGBEE & ASSOCIATES 3110 W Cheyenne Ave Ste 200, North Las Vegas, NV 89032 (813) 710-3013 (714) 597-6559 facsimile Email: mhigbee@higbee.law JS-6 Attorney for Plaintiff, NATASCHA LINDEMANN 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 NATASCHA LINDEMANN, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 Case No. 2:24-cv-04688 DDP (MAAx) v. OPTO AESTHETICS INC d/b/a AESDERMA MED SPA, and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 JUDGMENT ON MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Judge: Hon. Dean. D. Pregerson Courtroom: 9C Hearing Date: February 24, 2025 at 10:00AM 19 20 JUDGMENT 21 This case is before the Court on Plaintiff Natascha Lindemann (“Plaintiff”) 22 Motion for Entry of Default Judgment (“Motion”) [Dkt. # 18], seeking default 23 judgment against Opto Aesthetics Inc. d/b/a Aesderma Med Spa (“Defendant”). The 24 Clerk of the Court for the Central District of California entered the default of 25 Defendant on November 15, 2023 [Dkt. # 17]. 26 Having considered all matters of record, the arguments of counsel, and the 27 applicable legal authorities, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and 28 DECREED as follows: 1 JUDGEMENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment [Dkt. # 18] is GRANTED; 2. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504, 17 U.S.C. § 505; 3. Defendant is hereby ordered to pay statutory damages for infringement pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504 in the amount of $3,757.33; 4. Defendant is hereby ordered to pay Plaintiff’s reasonable attorneys fees pursuant 17 U.S.C. § 505 in the amount of $4,005; 5. Defendant is hereby ordered to pay Plaintiff’s costs pursuant 17 U.S.C. § 505 in the amount of $1,030; 10 6. Post-judgment interest shall accrue at the rate of .70% per annum, in 11 accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1961, from the date of entry of this Default 12 Judgment until the Judgment Amount and all accrued interest are paid in full 13 by Defendant to the Plaintiff; and, 14 15 7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Default Judgment. 16 There being no just reason for delay in the entry of this Default Judgment, the 17 Court hereby directs the clerk to enter judgment against Defendant pursuant to Rule 18 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 19 20 21 Dated: March 11, 2025 __ ____ HON. DEAN D. PREGERSON U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 JUDGEMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?