Alfred McZeal v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association et al
Filing
58
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. 47 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the McCarthy Defendants' motion to strike Plaintiffs Amended Complaint is granted and the McCarthy Defendants are dismissed from this action with prejudice. [See Order for further details.] (san)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ALFRED MCZEAL, JR.,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
v.
HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, et al.,
Case No. 2:24-cv-04714-RGK-PD
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT
AND ADOPTING FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
Defendants.
17
18
19
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Amended
20
Complaint, the special motion to strike Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint under
21
California Code of Civil Procedure § 425.16 filed by Defendants Melissa
22
Robbins Coutts and McCarthy & Holthus, LLP (the “McCarthy Defendants”),
23
the records on file, the Report and Recommendation of United States
24
Magistrate Judge (“Report”), Plaintiff’s Objections, Opposition, and
25
Declaration to the Report, and Plaintiff’s request for judicial notice. [Dkt.
26
Nos. 13, 31, 39, 42, 47, 49, 51-52.]
27
28
The Court has conducted a de novo review of the portions of the Report
to which Objections were directed. The Court accepts the findings and
1
recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and adopts them as its own
2
findings and conclusions.
3
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the McCarthy Defendants’ motion
4
to strike Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint is granted and the McCarthy
5
Defendants are dismissed from this action with prejudice.
6
7
DATED: January 28, 2025
8
9
HON. R. GARY KLAUSNER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?