Vaneatra Flynn v. Martin OMalley
Filing
25
JUDGMENT OF REMAND by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth: The Court, having approved the parties' Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment 23 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (kh)
1
12
JOSEPH T. MCNALLY
Acting United States Attorney
DAVID M. HARRIS
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Civil Division
CEDINA M. KIM
Assistant United States Attorney
Senior Trial Attorney, Civil Division
TINA L. NAICKER, CSBN 252766
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of Program Litigation, Office 7
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, MD 21235
Telephone: 510-970-4842
Email: tina.naicker@ssa.gov
13
Attorneys for Defendant
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
VANEATRA MICHELLE FLYNN,
Plaintiff,
18
19
v.
20
MICHELLE KING,
21
Acting Commissioner of Social
Security,
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Defendant.
No. 2:24-cv-06510-ADS
JUDGMENT OF REMAND
JS-6
1
The Court, having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand
2
Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment
3
(“Stipulation to Remand”) lodged concurrent with the lodging of the within
4
Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND
5
DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of
6
Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand.
7
8
9
10
DATED: __________________
01/28/2025
_________________________________
/s/ Autumn D. Spaeth
HON. AUTUMN D. SPAETH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?