In Re Debtors Chia Jung Chou and Jesus Guillermo Orozco

Filing 9

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: On August 20, 2024, Appellants Jesus Guillermo Orozco and Chia Jung Chou filed an appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court, Central District of California 1 . That same day, a Notice of App eal Deficiency to Appellant 3 , and a Notice of Deficiencies in Appeal from Bankruptcy Court 4 , noted that the Notice of Appeal has one or more deficiencies, namely that the Notice of Appeal omitted an "entered stamped copy or order, judgment , or decree." (ECF 34); see Fed. R. Bank. Pro. 8003(a)(3)(B) (requiring notice of appeal "be accompanied by the judgment or the appealable order or decree from which the appeal is taken"). On August 23, 2024, the Court Ordered Appellan ts to Show Cause no later than September 3, 2024, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution 7 . The Court informed Appellants that "[f]ailure to respond to the Courts Order may result in the dismissal of this action." (Id.) A review of the docket reveals that Appellant has not filed a corrected Notice of Appeal. Consequently, this appeal is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute.(Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JS-6

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No.

2:24-cv-07071-ODW
Bankruptcy Ct. Case No. 2:20-bk-13814-BB
Adversary Case No. 2:20-ap-01169-BB

Title

In re Debtors Chia Jung Chou and Jesus Guillermo Orozco

Present: The Honorable

Date

September 6, 2024

Otis D. Wright II, United States District Judge

Sheila English

Not reported

N/A

Deputy Clerk

Court Reporter / Recorder

Tape No.

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not present

Not present

Proceedings (In Chambers):
On August 20, 2024, Appellants Jesus Guillermo Orozco and Chia Jung Chou filed an
appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court, Central District of California. (Appellants’
Notice of Appeal (“Notice of Appeal”), ECF No. 1.) That same day, a Notice of Appeal
Deficiency to Appellant, (ECF No. 3), and a Notice of Deficiencies in Appeal from Bankruptcy
Court, (ECF No. 4), noted that the Notice of Appeal has one or more deficiencies, namely that
the Notice of Appeal omitted an “entered stamped copy or order, judgment, or decree.” (ECF
3–4); see Fed. R. Bank. Pro. 8003(a)(3)(B) (requiring notice of appeal “be accompanied by the
judgment or the appealable order or decree from which the appeal is taken”). On August 23,
2024, the Court Ordered Appellants to Show Cause no later than September 3, 2024, why this
case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (ECF No. 7.) The Court informed
Appellants that “[f]ailure to respond to the Court’s Order may result in the dismissal of this
action.” (Id.) A review of the docket reveals that Appellant has not filed a corrected Notice of
Appeal. Consequently, this appeal is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
:
Initials of Preparer

CV-90 (06/04)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

00

SE

Page 1 of 1