George W Shufelt, III v. Linda Davis et al

Filing 99

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by District Judge Percy Anderson for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 94 : ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation is adopted. 2. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. 3. The action is dismissed with prejudice. 4. The clerk shall serve this order and the judgment on all counsel or parties of record. (sl)

Download PDF
-PLA George W Shufelt, III v. Linda Davis et al Doc. 99 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the Magistrate Judge's Second Report and Recommendation, and plaintiff's Objections thereto. The Court agrees with the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED: 1. 2. 3. 4. The Report and Recommendation is adopted. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. The action is dismissed with prejudice. The clerk shall serve this order and the judgment on all counsel or parties of record. v. LINDA DAVIS, et al., Defendants. GEORGE W. SHUFELT, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. ED CV 07-1188-PA (PLA) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION DATED: December 21, 2010 HONORABLE PERCY ANDERSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?