Michael Handford Farris v. Guillermina Hall et al
Filing
71
JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter: IT IS ADJUDGED that the Second Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (am)
<![CDATA[
Michael Handford Farris v. Guillermina Hall et al
Doc. 71
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// /// /// UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL HANDFORD FARRIS, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) GUILLERMINA HALL MURREY, ) Warden, et al., ) ) Defendants ) ) of the United States Magistrate Judge, Case No. EDCV 08-472-DOC (OP) JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Order Adopting Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
IT IS ADJUDGED that the Second Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice.
DATED: October 25, 2010
HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER United States District Judge
Prepared by:
______________________________ HONORABLE OSWALD PARADA United States Magistrate Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
