Kanwaljit Singh Hundal v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabiliation

Filing 88

ORDER by Judge Christina A. Snyder 87 . In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, this action is dismissed with prejudice. Each party is to bear his or her own costs, fees and expenses of any type, including attorneys fees. There is no prevailing party in this action. The Court will maintain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (im)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 14 15 Case No. EDCV 08-543 CAS (MANx) KANWALJIT SINGH HUNDAL, [JS-6] v. HEIDI LACKNER, et al. , 16 Defendants. 17 18 In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), and pursuant 19 to the stipulation of the parties, this action is dismissed with prejudice. Each party 20 is to bear his or her own costs, fees and expenses of any type, including attorney’s 21 fees. There is no prevailing party in this action. The Court will maintain 22 jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: May 22, 2012 __________________________ The Hon. Christina A. Snyder United States District Judge 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?