Oscar Navarro v. City of Fontana et al

Filing 183

ORDER by Judge Virginia A. Phillips RE STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(ii) 182 : The above-captioned action is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, by Plaintiff as against Defendants CITY OF FONTANA, MICHAEL FREEMAN, and KELLEN GUTHRIE. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (ad)

1 S. Frank Harrell, Esq. [State Bar #133437]

[e-mail]

2 Pancy Lin Misa, Esq. [State Bar #239684]

[e-mail]

3 LYNBERG & WATKINS

A Professional Corporation

4 1100 Town & Country Rd., Suite 1450

Orange, California 92868

JS -6

5 [phone] Telephone

[phone] Facsimile

6

Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF FONTANA, MICHAEL FREEMAN, and

7 KELLEN GUTHRIE
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

CASE NO. EDCV 09-01525 VAP
(DTBx)

OSCAR NAVARRO,
11

Assigned for All Purposes to:
Hon. Virginia A. Phillips - Courtroom 2

Plaintiff,

12
13

vs.

ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR
DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FRCP
41(a)(1)(ii)

14
15 CITY OF FONTANA, a municipal

corporation; MICHAEL FREEMAN,

16 an individual; RONALD

VOGELSANG, an individual; and

17 DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
18

Defendants,
19
20 / / /
21 / / /
22 / / /
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL PURSUANT
TO FRCP 41(a)(1)(ii)

ORDER

1
2

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor, the

3 Court now rules as follows:
4

The above-captioned action is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, by

5 Plaintiff as against Defendants CITY OF FONTANA, MICHAEL FREEMAN, and
6 KELLEN GUTHRIE.
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8 DATED: August 04, 2011
9
10

By:
11
12

HON. VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS
United States District Court Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL PURSUANT
TO FRCP 41(a)(1)(ii)