David Upton v. Arnold Schwarzenegger et al
Filing
242
ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. for Report and Recommendation (Final), 241 . (See document for further details.) (sbou)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
DAVID UPTON,
11
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. ED CV 10-631-AB (PJW)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL REPORT AND
ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS,
AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
15
16
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s
17
motion for partial summary judgment, Defendant’s motion for summary
18
judgment, the records on file, and the Final Report and
19
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge.
20
engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which
21
Plaintiff objected.
22
recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and adopts them as its own
23
findings and conclusions.
24
25
26
27
28
The Court has
The Court accepts the findings and
1
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for partial
2
summary judgment is denied, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment
3
is granted, and the case is dismissed with prejudice.
4
5
DATED:
October 30, 2017.
6
7
8
ANDRE BIROTTE, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
C:\Users\ivaldes\AppData\Local\Temp\Order accep final r&r re msj.wpd
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?