David Upton v. Arnold Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 242

ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. for Report and Recommendation (Final), 241 . (See document for further details.) (sbou)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID UPTON, 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. ED CV 10-631-AB (PJW) ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s 17 motion for partial summary judgment, Defendant’s motion for summary 18 judgment, the records on file, and the Final Report and 19 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. 20 engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which 21 Plaintiff objected. 22 recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and adopts them as its own 23 findings and conclusions. 24 25 26 27 28 The Court has The Court accepts the findings and 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for partial 2 summary judgment is denied, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment 3 is granted, and the case is dismissed with prejudice. 4 5 DATED: October 30, 2017. 6 7 8 ANDRE BIROTTE, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 C:\Users\ivaldes\AppData\Local\Temp\Order accep final r&r re msj.wpd 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?