Jo Ann Fay v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al

Filing 47

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE APPLICATION AND CONTINUING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 43 but continues the hearing date on Defendants Motion for Partial Summary Judgment to Friday, December16, 2011, at 1:30 p.m. Plaintiff shall file her opposition by November 28, 2011, and Defendant shall file its reply by December 12, 2011, at 12:00 p.m. by Judge Dean D. Pregerson (lc)

Download PDF
1 2 O 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JO ANN FAY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, Defendant. ___________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. EDCV 10-00834 DDP (DTBx) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION AND CONTINUING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Docket No. 43] 17 18 Presently before the court is Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application 19 for Order to Preclude the Parties from Filing a Motion for Summary 20 Judgment on or before the Current Discovery Cutoff Date of November 21 17, 2011, or, Alternatively, November 22, 2011. 22 Plaintiff asks the court to preclude the parties from filing 23 for summary judgment, because Plaintiff has yet to complete her 24 discovery. 25 summary judgment on October 31, 2011, for a hearing on November 28, 26 2011. 27 Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application but continues the hearing date on 28 Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment to Friday, December Defendant nonetheless filed a motion for partial To ensure discovery is completed, the court therefore DENIES 1 16, 2011, at 1:30 p.m. Plaintiff shall file her opposition by 2 November 28, 2011, and Defendant shall file its reply by December 3 12, 2011, at 12:00 p.m. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 8 Dated: November 4, 2011 DEAN D. PREGERSON United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?