Jo Ann Fay v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
Filing
47
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE APPLICATION AND CONTINUING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 43 but continues the hearing date on Defendants Motion for Partial Summary Judgment to Friday, December16, 2011, at 1:30 p.m. Plaintiff shall file her opposition by November 28, 2011, and Defendant shall file its reply by December 12, 2011, at 12:00 p.m. by Judge Dean D. Pregerson (lc)
1
2
O
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JO ANN FAY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
v.
COSTCO WHOLESALE
CORPORATION, a Washington
corporation,
Defendant.
___________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. EDCV 10-00834 DDP (DTBx)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX
PARTE APPLICATION AND CONTINUING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
[Docket No. 43]
17
18
Presently before the court is Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application
19
for Order to Preclude the Parties from Filing a Motion for Summary
20
Judgment on or before the Current Discovery Cutoff Date of November
21
17, 2011, or, Alternatively, November 22, 2011.
22
Plaintiff asks the court to preclude the parties from filing
23
for summary judgment, because Plaintiff has yet to complete her
24
discovery.
25
summary judgment on October 31, 2011, for a hearing on November 28,
26
2011.
27
Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application but continues the hearing date on
28
Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment to Friday, December
Defendant nonetheless filed a motion for partial
To ensure discovery is completed, the court therefore DENIES
1
16, 2011, at 1:30 p.m.
Plaintiff shall file her opposition by
2
November 28, 2011, and Defendant shall file its reply by December
3
12, 2011, at 12:00 p.m.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
Dated: November 4, 2011
DEAN D. PREGERSON
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?