Elizabeth Vigeant v. Actavis Totowa LLC et al

Filing 12

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge A. Howard Matz. Based upon the parties Stipulation of Dismissal Without Prejudice 11 and for good cause appearing, this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. It is further ordered that, should Plaintiff re-file this case, the applicable statute of limitations will relate back to November 10, 2010, the date of filing in this action. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

EASTERN DIVISION

TUCKER ELLIS & WEST LLP

Cleveland ♦ Columbus ♦ Los Angeles ♦ San Francisco

11

ELIZABETH VIGEANT,

12

Case No. EDCV 10-01991-AHM (FFMx)
Assigned to Honorable A. Howard Matz

Plaintiff,

13

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT
PREJUDICE

v.

14

ACTAVIS TOTOWA LLC, et al.,
15
Defendants.

Complaint Filed: November 10, 2010

16

Based upon the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal Without Prejudice and for

17
18

good cause appearing, this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. It is

19

further ordered that, should Plaintiff re-file this case, the applicable statute of

20

limitations will relate back to November 10, 2010, the date of filing in this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22
23
24

JS-6

25
26

DATED: June 02, 2011

27

Honorable A. Howard Matz
U.S. District Court Judge

28

1

073021.001345\716854.1

ORDER OF DISMISSAL