Arnold Herrera v. City of San Bernardino et al

Filing 18

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Virginia A. Phillips, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 17 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. This action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety; and, 2. Each party shall bear its own attorneys fees and costs in connection with the prosecution and defense of this action. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mrgo)

JAMES F. PENMAN, City Attorney (91761)
STEPHEN R. ONSTOT, Deputy City Attorney III (139319)
2 300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, California 92418
3 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
4 [e-mail]
1

Attorneys for Defendants, CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, OFFICER TRAVIS
WALKER, OFFICER JESUS VEGA, OFFICER KIMBERLY HERNANDEZ,
6 OFFICER DEVON REID, AND SERGEANT ROBERT YOUNG
5

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

ARNOLD HERRERA,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO et al )
)
)
Defendants.
)
)

CASE NO.: EDCV 11-00204VAP(OPx)
ORDER DISMISSING
WITH PREJUDICE

ACTION

[FRCP 41(a)]

17
18
19

Upon consideration of the parties’ Joint Stipulation Dismissing Action With Prejudice,

20

and good cause appearing,

21

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

22

1.

This action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety; and,

23

2.

Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs in connection with

24
25

the prosecution and defense of this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated:July 21, 2011

_______________________________
United States District Court Judge

O:\ECF Ready\ED11CV00204-VAP (Arnold Herrera) Proposed Order Dismissing Action.wpd
1
[proposed] ORDER re Dismissal per FRCP 41 (a)
O:\ECF Ready\ED11CV00204-VAP (Arnold Herrera) Proposed Order Dismissing Action.wpd