Antonio J Hollis v. City of Redlands et al
Filing
26
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED. Plaintiff is ordered to submit the ordered status report and to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with the court order by March 6, 2012 (SEE MINUTES FOR DETAILS). (kca)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
ED CV 11-536-SJO (SP)
Title
ANTONIO J. HOLLIS v. JENNIFER ONTIVEROS
Present: The Honorable
Date
February 21, 2012
Sheri Pym, United States Magistrate Judge
Kimberly I. Carter
Deputy Clerk
None
Court Reporter / Recorder
None
Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff:
Attorneys Present for Defendant:
None Present
None Present
Proceedings:
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS
SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED
Under paragraph nine of the court's September 6, 2011 Case Management and
Scheduling Order, each party, either individually or jointly, was required to file a status
report no later than February 6, 2012. Defendant complied with this order through a
status report filed February 3, 2012. Plaintiff was reminded of this requirement by the
court in its January 19, 2012 Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Compel. But over
two weeks have passed beyond the February 6 deadline, and plaintiff has failed to file
such a status report. Nor has plaintiff made any other communication with the court.
Plaintiff is therefore in violation of the court's order. As such, plaintiff is ordered to
submit the ordered status report and to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed
for failure to comply with the court order by March 6, 2012.
As provided in the court’s September 6, 2011 case management order, plaintiff’s
status report – which must now be filed by March 6, 2012 – must comply with the
following guidelines:
The status report shall contain the following information: (a) a summary of the
proceedings to date and a statement of the principal issue(s) raised by the case; (b)
a statement as to whether all parties have been served, and if not, a proposed
deadline by which service will be completed; (c) a statement as to whether other
parties will be added or amended pleadings will be filed, and if so, a proposed
deadline by which those steps will be taken; (d) a description of any discovery
completed, and a schedule for any future discovery; (e) a list of contemplated
motions, if any, along with proposed dates for the filing and hearing of such
motions; (f) an estimate of the time likely to be required for trial, and a statement
as to whether trial by jury is desired and has been properly requested; (g) a
description of any settlement negotiations that have occurred, and a
recommendation as to the form of settlement conference or other method of
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
ED CV 11-536-SJO (SP)
Date
Title
February 21, 2012
ANTONIO J. HOLLIS v. JENNIFER ONTIVEROS
alternative dispute resolution that would be most appropriate given the nature of
this case; and (h) any suggestions the parties may wish to make regarding the
management of this action.
Plaintiff is again cautioned that failure to comply with this or any other court
order may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute and/or
failure to comply with a court order.
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?