Carmel Spiteri v. Riverside County et al

Filing 52

ORDER (1) ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, SHERIFF SNIFF AND CARREN ROBINSON'S MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND AS TO CERTAIN CAUSES OF ACTION by Judge Dale S. Fischer. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Court: (1) accepts the findings and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge;(2) grants Defendants City of Riverside, Sheriff Sniff and Carren Robinson's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Cause of Action without leave to amend and grants Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First, Third, Sixth and Seventh Causes of Action with leave to amend; and (3) Plaintiff is ordered to amend his Complaint to address the above-noted deficiencies and file a First Amended Complaint no later than June 18, 2012. 10 44 [SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS] (gr)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION

7
8
9
10
11

CARMEL SPITERI,

12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
v.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.

16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. ED CV 11-00822-DSF (VBK)
ORDER (1) ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND (2)
GRANTING DEFENDANTS COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE, SHERIFF SNIFF AND
CARREN ROBINSON’S MOTION TO
DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND AS TO
CERTAIN CAUSES OF ACTION

17

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint

18

and all other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation

19

of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged

20

in de novo review of Plaintiff’s “Motion for Reconsideration re:

21

Honourable Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation,” Defendants’

22

“Reply to Objections to Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

23

(Mislabeled as Motion for Reconsideration),” Plaintiff’s Objection to

24

the Honourable Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation,” and

25

Defendants’ “Reply to Objections to Report and Recommendation of

26

Magistrate Judge.”

27

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Court: (1) accepts the findings

28

and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge;(2) grants

1

Defendants City of Riverside, Sheriff Sniff and Carren Robinson’s

2

Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Cause of Action without leave to

3

amend and grants Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First,

4

Third, Sixth and Seventh Causes of Action with leave to amend; and (3)

5

Plaintiff is ordered to amend his Complaint to address the above-noted

6

deficiencies and file a First Amended Complaint no later than June 18,

7

2012.

8
5/10/12
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

DATED:
DALE S. FISCHER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE