Lorrie L. Arias v. Michael J. Astrue

Filing 20

JUDGMENT OF REMAND by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. The Court having approved the parties' Stipulation 18 to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment (Stipulation to Remand) lodged concu rrent with the lodging of the within Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ch)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. United States Attorney LEON W. WEIDMAN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Division TIMOTHY R. BOLIN, CSBN 259511 Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel 333 Market St., Ste. 1500 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8982 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 Email: timothy.bolin@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 EASTERN DIVISION 15 16 17 LORRIE L. ARIAS, 18 19 20 21 Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, 22 Defendant. 23 ) Case No. 5:11-cv-01084-PLA ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT OF REMAND ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 24 The Court having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand 25 26 Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment 27 (Stipulation to Remand) lodged concurrent with the lodging of the within 28 Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND //// 1 DECREED that the above-capt D D a tioned actio is reman on nded to the Commiss e sioner of 2 Social Secu S urity for fur rther proce eedings con nsistent wi the Stip ith pulation to Remand. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: March 13, 2012 D M 2 ___ _________ __________ __________ _________ _ HO PAUL L. ABRAM ON. MS Uni ited States Magistrate Judge e

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?