Lorrie L. Arias v. Michael J. Astrue
Filing
20
JUDGMENT OF REMAND by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. The Court having approved the parties' Stipulation 18 to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment (Stipulation to Remand) lodged concu rrent with the lodging of the within Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ch)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.
United States Attorney
LEON W. WEIDMAN
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Civil Division
TIMOTHY R. BOLIN, CSBN 259511
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
Office of the General Counsel
333 Market St., Ste. 1500
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8982
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
Email: timothy.bolin@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
EASTERN DIVISION
15
16
17
LORRIE L. ARIAS,
18
19
20
21
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,
22
Defendant.
23
) Case No. 5:11-cv-01084-PLA
)
)
)
)
) JUDGMENT OF REMAND
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
24
The Court having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand
25
26
Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment
27
(Stipulation to Remand) lodged concurrent with the lodging of the within
28
Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND
////
1
DECREED that the above-capt
D
D
a
tioned actio is reman
on
nded to the Commiss
e
sioner of
2
Social Secu
S
urity for fur
rther proce
eedings con
nsistent wi the Stip
ith
pulation to Remand.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DATED: March 13, 2012
D
M
2
___
_________
__________
__________
_________
_
HO PAUL L. ABRAM
ON.
MS
Uni
ited States Magistrate Judge
e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?